Landolfi v. North Haven
| Josephine Landolfi |
| Town of North Haven |
| 3:2022cv00770 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet Bond Arterton |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to respond to plaintiff's complaint, on consent, to 9/12/22. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 8/1/22. (Tooker, Aimee)
|
| Answer deadline updated for All Defendants. (Tooker, Aimee) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time until September 12, 2022 to respond to plaintiff's complaint by Town of North Haven. (Buturla, Richard) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard C Buturla on behalf of Town of North Haven (Buturla, Richard) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. Buturla on behalf of Town of North Haven (Buturla, Richard) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Town of North Haven* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael John Reilly* *Cicchiello & Cicchiello, LLP* *364 Franklin Avenue* *Hartford, CT 06114*. (Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Town of North Haven. (Reilly, Michael) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Josephine Landolfi, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 6/13/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 6/10/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 6/10/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/9/2022 Discovery due by 12/10/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 1/14/2023 Signed by Clerk on 6/10/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
| Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Town of North Haven ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6963066.), filed by Josephine Landolfi.(Reilly, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Landolfi v. North Haven | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Josephine Landolfi | |
| Represented By: | Michael John Reilly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Town of North Haven | |
| Represented By: | Richard C Buturla |
| Represented By: | Richard J. Buturla |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
