Matthews v. Ashraf et al
| William Matthews |
| Mahboob Ashraf, Sheila Baudin and Zelynette Caron |
| 3:2022cv00821 |
| June 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Change of Address by William Matthews (Corriette, M.) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 7/7/22. (Pesta, J.)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/27/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/27/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 6/29/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by William Matthews. (Carr, Dave) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by William Matthews. (Carr, Dave) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by William Matthews. (Carr, Dave) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Mahboob Ashraf, Sheila Baudin, Zelynette Caron, filed by William Matthews. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Carr, Dave) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
