Zeliankevich v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Svcs et al
| DZMITRY S. ZELIANKEVICH |
| UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, DEBRA ROGERS and United States Citizenship and Immigration Svcs |
| 3:2022cv00848 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Plaintiff has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal of all claims without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). (ECF No. #7 ). Therefore, this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/21/22. (Constantine, A.)
|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Johnson, D.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Dzmitry S. Zeliankevich (Hacking, James) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Debra Rogers, United States Citizenship and Immigration Svcs* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *James Oliver Hacking, III* *Hacking Law Practice, LLC* *10900 Manchester Rd, Ste 203* *St. Louis, MO 63122-1200*. (Peterson, M) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Debra Rogers, United States Citizenship and Immigration Svcs. (Hacking, James) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint, filed by Dzmitry S. Zeliankevich, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 07/12/2022. (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 07/06/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 07/06/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/4/2022. Discovery due by 1/5/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 2/9/2023. Signed by Clerk on 07/06/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
| Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Debra Rogers, United States Citizenship and Immigration Svcs ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6988742.), filed by Dzmitry S. Zeliankevich. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons USCIS, #3 Summons Jaddou, #4 Summons Local USCIS, #5 Summons US Att., #6 Summons Att. General)(Hacking, James) Modified on 7/7/2022 to correct parties (Hushin, Z.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
