Hoffman v. Great Northern Insurance Company
David G. Hoffman |
Great Northern Insurance Company |
3:2022cv00895 |
July 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Charles S Haight |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Answer deadline updated for Great Northern Insurance Company to 9/15/2022. (Sichanh, Christina) |
Filing 13 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting, absent objection and for good cause shown, Defendant's #12 Consented-To Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant Great Northern Insurance Company must answer or respond to the #11 Amended Complaint on or before September 15, 2022. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on August 25, 2022. (Dorais, L.) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until September 15, 2022 Respond to Amended Complaint #11 Amended Complaint by Great Northern Insurance Company. (Renaud, Jeffrey) |
Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by David G. Hoffman.(Benjamin, Daniel) |
Answer deadline updated for Great Northern Insurance Company to 8/15/2022. (Barry, Donna) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting, absent objection and for good cause shown, the #6 Consented to Motion for Extension of Time to Responsively Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Great Northern Insurance Company ("Great Northern"). Great Northern represents that it needs additional time to "continue its adjustment of the underlying insurance claim, as well as to assess the allegations in the Complaint, review relevant documentation relating to the Plaintiff's claims, and prepare an appropriate responsive pleading." Doc. #6 , at 2. Moreover, upon inquiry, Plaintiff's counsel has indicated that there is no objection to the granting of this request. Id. at 1. Under these circumstances, the Court GRANTS Great Northern's #6 motion. Accordingly, Great Northern must answer or respond to the Complaint on or before August 15, 2022. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on July 22, 2022. (Dorais, L.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Notice filed by Great Northern Insurance Company, #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement, filed by Great Northern Insurance Company, #8 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Notice filed by Great Northern Insurance Company, #6 MOTION for Extension of Time until August 15, 2022 (Consented To) to Responsively Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Great Northern Insurance Company, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Great Northern Insurance Company, #5 Notice of Appearance filed by Great Northern Insurance Company Signed by Clerk on 7/20/22. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Barry, Donna) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time until August 15, 2022 (Consented To) to Responsively Plead to Plaintiff's Complaint by Great Northern Insurance Company. (Butts, Josiah) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 7/15/22.(Barry, Donna) |
Filing 7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/13/2022, Discovery due by 1/14/2023, Dispositive Motions due by 2/18/2023 Signed by Clerk on 7/15/22.(Barry, Donna) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey Renaud on behalf of Great Northern Insurance Company (Renaud, Jeffrey) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Great Northern Insurance Company identifying Other Affiliate Federal Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Chubb Limited, Other Affiliate Chubb INA Holdings Inc., Other Affiliate Chubb Group Holdings Inc. for Great Northern Insurance Company. (Butts, Josiah) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Great Northern Insurance Company Notice Pending Motions (Butts, Josiah) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Great Northern Insurance Company (Statement in Compliance With Standing Order on Removed Cases) (Butts, Josiah) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Great Northern Insurance Company from Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford, case number FST-CV22-6057065-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6999488, filed by Great Northern Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Butts, Josiah) |
Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hoffman v. Great Northern Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David G. Hoffman | |
Represented By: | Daniel A. Benjamin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Great Northern Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Renaud |
Represented By: | Josiah T.D. Butts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.