Williams v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
| Lynda Williams |
| Prudential Insurance Company of America |
| 3:2022cv00921 |
| July 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Omar A Williams |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Selina Valdez on behalf of Lynda Williams (Valdez, Selina) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Attorney Selina R. Valdez to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Clerk on 7/26/2022. (LaLone, L.)
|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Prudential Insurance Company of America* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Ivan A. Ramos* *Ramos Law* *255 Main St., Suite 401* *Hartford, CT 06106*. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Selina R. Valdez to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7008043) filed by Lynda Williams, #1 Complaint filed by Lynda Williams. Signed by Clerk on 7/25/2022. (Mendez, D) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 7/22/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 7/22/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/20/2022. Discovery due by 1/21/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 2/25/2023. Signed by Clerk on 7/22/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Attorney(s) Selina R. Valdez to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7008043) by Lynda Williams. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Ramos, Ivan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Prudential Insurance Company of America ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7008033.), filed by Lynda Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramos, Ivan) |
| Judge Omar A. Williams added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Prudential Insurance Company of America. (Ramos, Ivan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lynda Williams | |
| Represented By: | Ivan A. Ramos |
| Represented By: | Selina Valdez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
