Mead v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Jane Mead
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2022cv00935
Filed: July 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Alvin W Thompson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by June Lee Byun on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Byun, June)
August 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is hereby GRANTED. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 8/8/2022. (Mata, E.)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Alvin W. Thompson who presided over related cases 3:15-cv-01331-AWT Mead v. Colvin and 3:20-cv-00128-AWT Mead v. Saul. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/4/2022.(Anastasio, F.)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/26/2022. (Oliver, T.)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/26/2022. (Oliver, T.)
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent form) (Oliver, T.)
July 26, 2022 Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 9/24/2022. (Oliver, T.)
July 26, 2022 Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. Motions referred to Thomas O. Farrish(Freberg, B)
July 26, 2022 Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jane Mead. (Fishman, Daniel)
July 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Jane Mead. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fishman, Daniel) Modified on 7/27/2022 to correct party (Anastasio, F.).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mead v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Mead
Represented By: Daniel Hersh Fishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: June Lee Byun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?