Pizziconi v. Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc.
Andrea Pizziconi |
Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. |
3:2022cv00936 |
July 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarala V Nagala |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Defendant's Motion to Withdraw; finding as moot #14 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, given Defendant's request to withdraw. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 9/21/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn) |
Filing 17 MOTION to Withdraw #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc.. (Gondek, Timothy) |
Filing 16 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc.. (Gondek, Timothy) |
Filing 15 ORDER. Defendant Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. has failed to file the corporate disclosure statement required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, despite appearing and responding to the complaint. See ECF Nos. 8, 11, 14. Defendant must file its corporate disclosure statement by September 12, 2022. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 9/7/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn) |
Filing 14 WITHDRAWN - MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc..Responses due by 9/21/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D)(Gondek, Timothy) Modified on 9/22/2022 to mark as withdrawn. See 18 Order. (Bozek, M.). |
Answer deadline updated for Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. to 8/31/2022. See 13 order. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time until August 31, 2022, to respond to the complaint, ECF No. #1 . Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/19/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time until 8/31/2022 to file a pleading or motion pursuant to Rule 12, in response to plaintiff's #1 Complaint by Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc.. (Gondek, Timothy) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy M. Gondek on behalf of Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. (Gondek, Timothy) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/4/2022.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Andrea Pizziconi. Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. served on 7/28/2022, answer due 8/18/2022. (Steigman, Todd) |
Filing 8 ORDER. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/28/2022.(Bozek, M.) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Todd D. Steigman* *Madsen, Prestley & Parenteau, LLC-HTFD* *402 Asylum Street* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Notice, #1 Complaint filed by Andrea Pizziconi, #4 Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines. Signed by Clerk on 7/27/2022. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 5 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 7/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Attachment) (Mendez, D) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/26/2022. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/26/2022. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/24/2022. Discovery due by 1/25/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 3/1/2023. Signed by Clerk on 7/26/2022. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7011876.), filed by Andrea Pizziconi.(Steigman, Todd) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc.. (Steigman, Todd) |
Judge Sarala V. Nagala added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pizziconi v. Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Andrea Pizziconi | |
Represented By: | Todd D. Steigman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vanessa Research Holdings, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Timothy M. Gondek |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.