Amica Mutual Ins Co v. Robert Bosch LLC et al
| Amica Mutual Ins Co |
| Robert Bosch LLC and BSH Home Appliances Corp |
| 3:2022cv00990 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 NOTICE by BSH Home Appliances Corp re #1 Notice of Removal, Supplemental Filing in Support of Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of R. Miklautsch re Citizenship of Robert Bosch LLC)(Berglund, Curtis) |
| Filing 16 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Amica Mutual Ins Co. (Finkelstein, Mara) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint with Special Defenses with Jury Demand BSH Home Appliances Corporations Answer and Separate Defenses to the Plaintiffs Complaint by BSH Home Appliances Corp.(Berglund, Curtis) |
Filing 14
ORDER. Defendant BSH Home Appliances Corporation ("BSH") invokes diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC Section 1332 in its Notice of Removal, at ECF No. #1 . As basis for this jurisdiction, BSH indicates that Defendant Robert Bosch, LLC ("Bosch") exists pursuant to the laws of the State of Michigan and that its principal place of business is in Michigan. However, a limited liability company's citizenship for diversity purposes is determined by the citizenship of all of its members. See Carden v. Arkoma Associates, 494 U.S. 185, 195-96 (1990); Raymond Loubier Irrevocable Trust v. Loubier, 858 F.3d 719, 729 (2d Cir. 2017). Accordingly, the Notice of Removal does not adequately set forth the basis for this Court's subject matter jurisdiction. And although Bosch consented to the removal of this action, it did not supply the information necessary to confirm diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, on or before August 25, 2022, Bosch shall file a Notice apprising the Court of its citizenship as is determined for purposes of diversity jurisdiction. Failure to do so may result in remand of this action without further notice from the Court. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/4/2022. (Banker, Joshua)
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by John Anthony Donovan, III on behalf of Amica Mutual Ins Co (Donovan, John) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Mara E Finkelstein on behalf of Amica Mutual Ins Co (Finkelstein, Mara) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE US DISTRICT COURT OF CONNECTICUT Re: Local Rule 83.1 Admission of Attorneys. The above captioned case has been received and filed in our court. Please see our Local Rule 83.1 regarding Admission of Attorneys that is available on our website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. You will not be added to the case, nor will we accept further filings until you have complied with Local Rule 83.1. If you have any questions about this procedure, please contact the Clerk's Office. Signed by Clerk on 8/4/2022. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #9 Protective Order, #3 Notice of Appearance filed by BSH Home Appliances Corp, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by BSH Home Appliances Corp, #5 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by BSH Home Appliances Corp, #6 Notice (Other), filed by BSH Home Appliances Corp, #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Notice (Other) filed by BSH Home Appliances Corp, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by BSH Home Appliances Corp, #8 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 8/4/2022. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases) (Fanelle, N.) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/3/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/3/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/2/2022 Discovery due by 2/2/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 3/9/2023 Signed by Clerk on 8/3/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by BSH Home Appliances Corporation Defendant BSH Home Appliances Corporations Statement Pursuant to Standing Order in Removed Cases (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Return of Service, #2 Exhibit UPS Tracking Information)(Berglund, Curtis) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by BSH Home Appliances Corporation identifying Corporate Parent BSH Hausgerte GmbH for BSH Home Appliances Corporation. (Berglund, Curtis) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by BSH Home Appliances Corporation Notice of No Pending Motions (Berglund, Curtis) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by James M. Campbell on behalf of BSH Home Appliances Corporation (Campbell, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Curtis A Berglund on behalf of BSH Home Appliances Corporation (Berglund, Curtis) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by BSH Home Appliances Corporation from J.D. of Hartford, case number HHD-CV22-6157648-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7022441, filed by BSH Home Appliances Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs Summons, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Return of Service, #4 Exhibit USPS Tracking Number, #5 Exhibit State Court Docket, #6 Exhibit Consent to Removal, #7 Exhibit State Court NOR, #8 Exhibit Civil Action Sheet)(Berglund, Curtis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
