Collazo v. Milford Transit
| Angel Collazo |
| Milford Transit |
| 3:2022cv01006 |
| August 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Angel Collazo, #1 Complaint filed by Angel Collazo, #5 Standing Protective Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, and #6 Notice re: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 10/6/2022.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing fee received from Angel Collazo: $ 402.00, receipt number BPT13243. Manual receipt #373857. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Amend Complaint #1 Complaint, by Angel Collazo.Responses due by 10/24/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 8
RECOMMENDED RULING - that recommends (a) that the IFP motion at ECF No. 2 be denied, and (b) that the complaint be dismissed in part without prejudice to repleading, and allowed to proceed to service of process in part. #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Angel Collazo, #1 Complaint filed by Angel Collazo 12 Pages. Objections due by 10/11/2022 Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 9/20/22.(Wood, R.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish for a ruling on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and an initial review of the complaint. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/15/2022.Motion referred to Thomas O. Farrish(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE re: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 8/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Identification of Initial Discovery Protocol for Employment Cases)(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/8/2022.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/8/2022.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/7/2022. Discovery due by 2/7/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 3/14/2023. Signed by Clerk on 8/8/2022.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Angel Collazo. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Milford Transit, filed by Angel Collazo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Bozek, M.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Collazo v. Milford Transit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angel Collazo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Milford Transit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
