Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
Ismael H. Padilla |
City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co, Greg Abbott, Lana Mcdaniels, Manny Alvarez, Judges, US District Court, Appeals Court and Texas Supreme Court |
3:2022cv01052 |
August 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Stefan R Underhill |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE RE: INDEX AND RECORD ON APPEAL re: #6 Notice of Appeal. The attached docket sheet is hereby certified as the entire Index/Record on Appeal in this matter and electronically sent to the Court of Appeals, with the exception of any manually filed documents as noted below. Dinah Milton Kinney, Clerk. Documents manually filed not included in this transmission: none (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 5 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Ismael H. Padilla. (Attachments: #1 copy of envelope)(Oliver, T.) |
|
|
|
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ismael H. Padilla. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Greg Abbott, Mark J. Alvarez, Appeals Court, City, Town or Municipality of Dallas, Judges, Lana Mcdaniels, Supreme Court, US District Court, filed by Ismael H. Padilla. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Fanelle, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.