Raleigh v. Baribault et al
| Kyle Raleigh and Kyle S Raleigh |
| Donna M Baribault and Michael P Durvin |
| 3:2022cv01069 |
| August 24, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER. Counsel for defendants have filed a "notice of counsel" (Doc. #15 ) stating their apparent intention to appear for the defendants in this action. They shall do so and file any answer or other response to the complaint by November 8, 2022. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/18/22.(Barry, Donna)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Counsel by Donna M Baribault (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Kyle S Raleigh. (Raleigh, Kyle) |
| Filing 13 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Kyle S Raleigh. (Raleigh, Kyle) |
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. SELF-REPRESENTED FILERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE'S STANDARD ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER WHICH IS ATTACHED. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/20/22.(Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting plaintiff's Motion (Doc. #3 ) to participate in electronic filing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/20/22. (Barry, Donna)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Donna M. Baribault and Michael P. Durvin by Kyle Raleigh. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kyle Raleigh. Donna M Baribault served on 8/25/2022, answer due 9/15/2022; Michael P Durvin served on 8/25/2022, answer due 9/15/2022. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Donna M Baribault, Michael P Durvin* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Kyle Raleigh* *437 N. Canterbury Rd.* *Canterbury, CT 06331*. (Carr, Dave) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Protective Order, #2 Consent to Electronic Notice filed by Kyle Raleigh, #1 Complaint filed by Kyle Raleigh, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 MOTION for To Participate in Electronic Filing Order filed by Kyle Raleigh, #5 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 8/24/2022.(Carr, Dave) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/24/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/24/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/23/2022 Discovery due by 2/23/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 3/30/2023 Signed by Clerk on 8/24/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION To Participate in Electronic Filing by Kyle Raleigh. (Carr, Dave) |
| Filing 2 Consent to Electronic Notice by Kyle Raleigh (Carr, Dave) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Donna M Baribault, Michael P Durvin, filed by Kyle Raleigh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Carr, Dave) |
| Filing fee received from Kyle Raleigh: $ 402, receipt number HFD19329 (Carr, Dave) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Donna M Baribault, Michael P Durvin. (Carr, Dave) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
