Crossford International, LLC et al v. Keith Handy Design Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Crossford International, LLC and Goodway Technologies Corporation
Defendant: Keith Handy Design Ltd. and Keith David Handy
Case Number: 3:2022cv01083
Filed: August 26, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Protective Order, #5 Order, #6 Report on Patent/Trademark Form, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint, filed by Goodway Technologies Corporation, Crossford International, LLC, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 8/29/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
August 29, 2022 Filing 6 AO 120 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Patent Form Completed. (Fanelle, N.)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing Order in Patent Cases Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/26/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/26/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/26/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
August 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/25/2022 Discovery due by 2/25/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 4/1/2023 Signed by Clerk on 8/26/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
August 26, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Keith David Handy, Keith Handy Design Ltd. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7048234.), filed by Crossford International, LLC, Goodway Technologies Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G, #2 Exhibit I-O, #3 Exhibit H (1 of 2), #4 Exhibit H (2 or 2), #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sharinn, Todd)
August 26, 2022 Judge Kari A. Dooley added. (Freberg, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crossford International, LLC et al v. Keith Handy Design Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crossford International, LLC
Represented By: Todd S. Sharinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Goodway Technologies Corporation
Represented By: Todd S. Sharinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith Handy Design Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keith David Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?