Ayala v. Metro-North Railroad Company
| Harold Ayala |
| Metro-North Railroad Company |
| 3:2022cv01108 |
| September 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet C Hall |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: Amended Pleadings due by 11/21/2022; Discovery due by 8/1/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 9/1/2023; Joint Status Report due by 1/25/2023; Joint Trial Memorandum due by 9/1/2023. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/25/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 13 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Cahill, George) |
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/5/22.(Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Janet C. Hall for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 10/5/2022.(Hushin, Z.)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Metro-North Railroad Company.(Fineman, Beck) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE. All parties are advised that they may elect to consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. United States Magistrate Judges do not conduct felony criminal trials; as a result, parties are often able to schedule a jury trial before a Magistrate Judge sooner and with more flexibility than a jury trial before a District Judge. If all parties consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge, the parties should complete and file the attached consent form. If any party does not consent, that information should not be conveyed to the Court, and no consent form should be filed. The Court notes that ordinarily, where the parties consent to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, any Magistrate Judge who has previously been involved in confidential settlement discussions would not be assigned to hear the trial. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/20/2022.(Caffrey, A.) |
| Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/2/2022 (Caffrey, A.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Beck S. Fineman on behalf of Metro-North Railroad Company (Fineman, Beck) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER. All counsel and self-represented parties are advised that any requests for relief, including the rescheduling of conferences or hearings that have been calendared on ECF, must be made by filing of a motion on the docket, in full compliance with all applicable Federal and Local Rules. Relief from deadlines, orders, and calendars may not be obtained by calling or emailing chambers staff or the Clerk's Office. Court staff cannot provide advice or guidance, and ex parte communications with the Court are generally improper. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/2/2022.(Caffrey, A.)
|
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Metro-North Railroad Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *George J. Cahill, Jr.* *Cahill & Perry, P.C.* *43 Trumbull St.* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Harold Ayala, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 9/2/2022.(Imbriani, Susan) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/1/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/1/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/31/2022; Discovery due by 3/3/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 4/7/2023. Signed by Clerk on 9/1/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Metro-North Railroad Company ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7054994.), filed by Harold Ayala. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Civil Cover Sheet)(Cahill, George) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Metro-North Railroad Company. (Cahill, George) |
| Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ayala v. Metro-North Railroad Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Harold Ayala | |
| Represented By: | George J. Cahill, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metro-North Railroad Company | |
| Represented By: | Beck S. Fineman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
