Arpino v. Spero et al
Plaintiff: Holly H. Arpino
Defendant: Michael A Spero, Heather Wright and Ryan Walsh
Case Number: 3:2022cv01114
Filed: September 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Referring Judge: Thomas O Farrish
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 11, 2022 Filing 10 OBJECTION to #8 Recommended Ruling filed by Holly H. Arpino. (Oliver, T.)
October 11, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Holly H. Arpino. Responses due by 11/1/2022 (Oliver, T.)
September 22, 2022 Filing 8 RECOMMENDED RULING - Recommending that Judge Dooley dismiss the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915, #1 Complaint filed by Holly H. Arpino. 11 Pages. Objections due by 10/11/2022. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 9/22/22.(Wood, R.)
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 9/22/22. (Wood, R.)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish for ruling on motion including #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/7/2022. Motion referred to Thomas O. Farrish.(Gould, K.)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/2/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/2/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
September 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/1/2022 Discovery due by 3/4/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 4/8/2023 Signed by Clerk on 9/2/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
September 2, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Holly H. Arpino. (Fanelle, N.)
September 2, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael A Spero, Ryan Walsh, Heather Wright, filed by Holly H. Arpino. (Fanelle, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arpino v. Spero et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Holly H. Arpino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael A Spero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heather Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryan Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?