Dailey v. Pullen
Michelle S. Dailey and Michelle Dailey |
Timithea Pullen |
3:2022cv01121 |
September 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarah A L Merriam |
Stefan R Underhill |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Stefan R. Underhill for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 10/5/2022.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 5 Letter from Michelle Dailey dated 9/19/2022 Re: plaintiff being quarantined (Attachments: #1 envelope) (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is hereby ORDERED that the respondent file a response to the petition on or before November 8, 2022, showing why the relief sought in the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/12/2022. (Katz, S.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/7/2022.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 2 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/7/2022.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michelle S. Dailey. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing fee received from Michelle Dailey: $ 5.00, receipt number 25616 (Imbriani, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.