Evo Systems, LLC v. Autoslide Australia
Evo Systems, LLC |
Autoslide Australia doing business as Autoslide, LLC and Autoslide, LLC |
3:2022cv01132 |
September 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Janet Bond Arterton |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Autoslide, LLC waiver sent on 10/26/2022, answer due 12/25/2022 filed by Evo Systems, LLC. (Driscoll, Ryan) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS REISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Autoslide, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Ryan P Driscoll-Berchem Moses P.C.* *75 Broad St.* *Milford, CT 06460*. (Sichanh, Christina) |
Filing 11 ENTERED IN ERROR: ELECTRONIC SUMMONS REISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Autoslide, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Ryan P Driscoll- Berchem Moses P.C.* *75 Broad St.* *Milford, CT 06460*. (Sichanh, Christina) Modified on 10/26/2022 (Sichanh, Christina). |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Autoslide, LLC, filed by Evo Systems, LLC.(Driscoll, Ryan) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Autoslide, LLC. (Driscoll, Ryan) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS REISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Autoslide, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Ryan P Driscoll Berchem Moses P.C.* *75 Broad St.* *Milford, CT 06460*. (Sichanh, Christina) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Motion to Amend/Correct Case Caption and Complaint. Plaintiff is directed to file its corrected amended complaint forthwith. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 10/24/22. (Tooker, Aimee) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Evo Systems, LLC.Responses due by 11/11/2022 (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint)(Driscoll, Ryan) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Autoslide, LLC. (Driscoll, Ryan) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Autoslide Australia* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Ryan P Driscoll* *Berchem Moses P.C.* *75 Broad St.* *Milford, CT 06460*. (Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Evo Systems, LLC Signed by Clerk on 9/8/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 9/7/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 9/7/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/6/2022 Discovery due by 3/9/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 4/13/2023 Signed by Clerk on 9/7/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Autoslide Australia ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7060265.), filed by Evo Systems, LLC.(Driscoll, Ryan) Modified on 9/7/2022 to correct party(Hushin, Z.). |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Autoslide Australia. (Driscoll, Ryan) Modified on 9/7/2022 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
Judge Janet Bond Arterton added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.