McCormick v. DXC Technology
Robert McCormick |
DXC Technology |
3:2022cv01210 |
September 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Thomas O Farrish |
Omar A Williams |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadline: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/5/2023. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 12 ANSWER to #2 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by DXC Technology.(Sterling, Jonathan) |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DXC Technology. (Sterling, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan C. Sterling on behalf of DXC Technology (Sterling, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to DXC Technology waiver sent on 9/29/2022, answer due 11/28/2022 filed by Robert McCormick. (Fitzgerald, Stephen) |
Filing 9 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 9/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Attachment). Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached document. (Barry, L) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Betsy Ingraham on behalf of Robert McCormick (Ingraham, Betsy) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Complaint filed by Robert McCormick, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Protective Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Notice of Appearance filed by Robert McCormick Signed by Clerk on 9/27/2022. (Barry, L) |
Filing 5 Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 9/27/2022. (Barry, L) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 9/27/2022. (Barry, L) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/26/2022 Discovery due by 3/29/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 5/3/2023 Signed by Clerk on 9/27/2022. (Barry, L) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT against DXC Technology, filed by Robert McCormick.(Walker, J.) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen J. Fitzgerald on behalf of Robert McCormick (Fitzgerald, Stephen) |
Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing fee received from Garrison, Levin-Epstein, Fitzgerald & Pirrotti, P.C.: $ 402, receipt number ACTDC-7081787 (Walker, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McCormick v. DXC Technology | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert McCormick | |
Represented By: | Betsy Ingraham |
Represented By: | Stephen J. Fitzgerald |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: DXC Technology | |
Represented By: | Jonathan C. Sterling |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.