Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC |
| John Doe |
| 3:2022cv01277 |
| October 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert M Spector |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - single transaction of each work infringed, #2 Exhibit B - Paige Declaration, #3 Exhibit C - Stalzer Declaration)(James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.Responses due by 11/11/2022 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, #6 Protective Order, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Report on Copyright Form Signed by Clerk on 10/14/2022.(Oliver, T.) |
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/12/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/12/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/11/2022 Discovery due by 4/13/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 5/18/2023 Signed by Clerk on 10/12/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 3 AO 121 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Copyright Form Completed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - single transaction of each work infringed)(James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC identifying Corporate Parent General Media Systems, LLC for Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (James, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Doe ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7099316.), filed by Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - single transaction of each work infringed, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(James, Jacqueline) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Strike 3 Holdings, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline M. James |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: John Doe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
