Mustafah v. Kijakazi
| Sadeek Mustafah |
| Social Security, Commissioner Of and Kilolo Kijakazi |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv01302 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Michael P Shea |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for all purposes including issuing a Recommended Ruling. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/8/2022.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Jurrens on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Jurrens, Erin) |
Filing 11
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Michael P. Shea for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 11/1/2022.(Hushin, Z.)
|
|
Filing 10
REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has fully completed the required information. He asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that Plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint (Doc. #1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant.ORDER finding as moot #3 a duplicate Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia on 10/21/22. (Esposito, A.)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by June Lee Byun on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Byun, June) |
| Filing 3 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sadeek Mustafah. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Buckley, Melissa) |
| Filing 7 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Oliver, T.) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/17/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/17/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/17/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent form) (Oliver, T.)
|
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia added. Motions referred to Maria E. Garcia (Oliver, T.) |
| Answer deadline updated for Kilolo Kijakazi to 12/16/2022. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sadeek Mustafah. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Financial)(Buckley, Melissa). Added MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on 10/18/2022 (Hushin, Z.). Modified on 10/18/2022 to correct motion type(Hushin, Z.). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Sadeek Mustafah.(Buckley, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
