USA v. Contents of the Binance Account
| USA |
| Contents of the Binance Account |
| Sanjay Laljibhai Ahir |
| 3:2022cv01308 |
| October 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Janet C Hall |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Forfeiture of Property by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Decree of Forfeiture)(Nelson, David) |
| Filing 14 DEFAULT JUDGMENT entered in favor of USA against Sanjay Laljibhai Ahir Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/14/2022.(Lewis, D) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Default Judgment. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/14/2022. (Lewis, D)
|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Lewis, D) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Sanjay Laljibhai Ahir by USA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Default Judgment)(Nelson, David) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Default Entry 55(a). Motion for default judgment due by 1/9/2023. A Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b) shall be filed or this action will be dismissed. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/08/2022. (DeRubeis, B.)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Sanjay Laljibhai Ahir by USA. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Entry of 55A Default)(Nelson, David) |
| Filing 9 RETURN ON SERVICE by Publication filed by USA. Last publication date November 18, 2022. (Nelson, David) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by USA re #7 Certificate of Service demonstrating Mr. Ahir's receipt of service (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Nelson, David) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by USA (Nelson, David) |
| Filing 6 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem issued (Lewis, D) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by USA, #4 Order, #2 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 10/19/2022.(Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER RE DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/19/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/19/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 10/19/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Contents of the Binance Account, filed by USA.(Nelson, David) Modified on 10/19/2022 to correct party(Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Janet C. Hall and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
