Luxottica Group, SPA v. Farmington Fuels Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group SPA
Defendant: Farmington Fuels Corporation and Muhammad Khan
Case Number: 3:2022cv01322
Filed: October 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarala V Nagala
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Default Entry 55(a) as to Farmington Fuels Corporation and Muhammad Khan. Motion for default judgment due by 1/12/2023. A Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b) shall be filed or this action will be dismissed. Signed by Clerk on 12/13/2022. (Bozek, M.)
December 1, 2022 Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Farmington Fuels Corporation. (Fiano, Sabato)
December 1, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Sabato Pellegrino Fiano on behalf of Farmington Fuels Corporation, Muhammad Khan (Fiano, Sabato)
November 22, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Default Entry 55(a) as to Farmington Fuels Corporation and Muhammad Khan by Luxottica Group SPA. (Sullivan, Bradford)
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE DEFENDANTS' FAILURE TO ANSWER OR TIMELY RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Defendants were required to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by November 17, 2022. See ECF Nos. 10, 11. Accordingly, given Defendants' failure to timely file an answer or other response to the complaint, the Court directs Plaintiff to move for entry of a default against Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) on or before December 13, 2022. Failure to do so will result in the Court dismissing the case for failure to prosecute. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 41(a). In the event that Defendants choose in the interim to file an answer or other response to the complaint, Defendants shall also file a motion for extension of time nunc pro tunc stating why there is good cause for their failure to comply with the scheduling requirements of the Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/22/2022. (Kuegler, Adam)
November 10, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Luxottica Group SPA. Muhammad Khan served on 10/27/2022, answer due 11/17/2022. (Sullivan, Bradford)
November 10, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Luxottica Group SPA. Farmington Fuels Corporation served on 10/27/2022, answer due 11/17/2022. (Sullivan, Bradford)
November 2, 2022 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Luxottica Group SPA. (Sullivan, Bradford)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 10/28/2022.(Bozek, M.)
October 24, 2022 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Farmington Fuels Corporation, Muhammad Khan* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Bradford J. Sullivan* *Law Offices of Bradford J. Sullivan* *588 Boston Post Road 2nd Floor P.O. Box 1206* *Madison, CT 06443*. (Mendez, D)
October 24, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Luxottica Group SPA, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #5 Report on Patent/Trademark Form. Signed by Clerk on 10/24/2022.(Mendez, D)
October 24, 2022 Filing 5 AO 120 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Patent or Trademark Form Completed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Mendez, D)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 10/21/2022. (Mendez, D)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 10/21/2022. (Mendez, D)
October 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/20/2022. Discovery due by 4/22/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 5/27/2023. Signed by Clerk on 10/21/2022. (Mendez, D)
October 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Farmington Fuels Corporation, Muhammad Khan ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7109618.), filed by Luxottica Group, SPA.(Sullivan, Bradford) Modified on 10/21/2022 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
October 21, 2022 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Farmington Fuels Corporation, Muhammad Khan. (Sullivan, Bradford)
October 21, 2022 Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luxottica Group, SPA v. Farmington Fuels Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group SPA
Represented By: Bradford J. Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Farmington Fuels Corporation
Represented By: Sabato Pellegrino Fiano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Muhammad Khan
Represented By: Sabato Pellegrino Fiano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?