Neto v. Bristol-Myers Squibb et al
| Eugenia Neto |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Upsher-Smith Laboratories, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Upsher Smith Laboratories |
| 3:2022cv01344 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
RESPONSE re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb. (Eastwood, Janna)
|
|
Filing 14
CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Hillary Dang to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7124529) by Bristol-Myers Squibb. (Dang, Hillary)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Hillary Dang on behalf of Bristol-Myers Squibb (Dang, Hillary)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Hillary Dang, Esq. Certificate of Good Standing due by 1/3/2023. Signed by Clerk on 11/4/2022. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph W. Martini on behalf of Bristol-Myers Squibb (Martini, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Attorney(s) Hillary Dang to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7124529) by Bristol-Myers Squibb. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Hillary Dang)(Eastwood, Janna)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE by Bristol-Myers Squibb re #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Eastwood, Janna)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss by Bristol-Myers Squibb.Responses due by 11/22/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Exhibits A-D to Memorandum of Law)(Eastwood, Janna)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE by Bristol-Myers Squibb re #1 Notice of Removal, Statement Regarding Removal (Eastwood, Janna)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb, #5 Protective Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 10/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Standing order on removed cases)(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Bristol-Myers Squibb. (Eastwood, Janna) Modified on 10/26/2022 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/25/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/25/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/24/2022; Discovery due by 4/26/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 5/31/2023. Signed by Clerk on 10/25/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Bristol-Myers Squibb from CT Superior Court, case number UHY-CV22-5030946-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7113540, filed by Bristol-Myers Squibb. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Complaint)(Eastwood, Janna) Modified on 10/26/2022 to correct party(Hushin, Z.).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
