Klaneski v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
| Rosa Lee Klaneski |
| State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Robert Fulginti, Kelly Tierney and Robert Fulginiti |
| 3:2022cv01458 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Insurance |
| 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Answer deadline updated for Robert Fulginiti to 1/19/2023; Kelly Tierney to 1/19/2023. (Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company to 1/19/2023. (Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court GRANTS the motion for extension of time. Defendants Robert Fulginiti and Kelly Tierney shall respond to the Complaint by January 19, 2023. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/22/2022. (Bartlett, H)
|
|
Filing 11
OBJECTION re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time until January 19, 2023 to Respond to the Complaint filed by Rosa Lee Klaneski. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION for Extension of Time until January 19, 2023 to Respond to the Complaint by Robert Fulginiti, Kelly Tierney. (Fain, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time. The Court GRANTS the motion for extension of time. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company shall respond to the Complaint by January 19, 2023. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/21/2022. (Bartlett, H)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time until January 19, 2023 to Answer the Complaint by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Fain, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 7
Consent to Electronic Notice by Rosa Lee Klaneski (Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Robert Fulginti, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Kelly Tierney* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Rosa Lee Klaneski* *8 Farmington Meadow Drive* *Farmington, CT 06032-2040*. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Rosa Lee Klaneski, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 11/16/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/14/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/14/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/13/2023; Discovery due by 5/16/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 6/20/2023. Signed by Clerk on 11/14/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Judge Victor A. Bolden and Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Robert Fulginiti, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Kelly Tierney, filed by Rosa Lee Klaneski. (Barry, L) Modified on 11/29/2022 Name Correction (Barry, L).
|
|
Filing fee received from Rosa Lee Klaneski: $ 402, manual receipt number 730536. (Barry, L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
