A.B. Corp. v. Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC
| A.B. Corp. |
| Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC |
| 3:2022cv01474 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Robert M Spector |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Set Deadline: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/20/2023. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 53
ORDER granting #52 Motion to Stay, in light of the parties' continued efforts to settle this case. All current briefing deadlines in the case are vacated, and the evidentiary hearing scheduled for January 19, 2023, is canceled. The mediation scheduled for January 13, 2023, with Judge Martinez is also canceled. The parties may contact Judge Martinez about rescheduling the mediation.The Court sets the following new deadlines. By February 20, 2023, the parties shall file a joint status report apprising the Court as to the status of settlement discussions. If the case has not settled by March 7, 2023, then the parties shall file the following by March 21, 2023: (1) a joint Rule 26(f) Report, and (2) a proposed schedule to complete the briefing and hold an evidentiary hearing on Plaintiff's pending motion for a preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 1/6/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 52
Emergency MOTION to Stay re #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Order to Show Cause MOTION for Hearing (Consented to by Plaintiff) by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC.Responses due by 1/27/2023 (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 50
ORDER granting #49 Motion for Extension of Time until January 6, 2023, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 1/4/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 49
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until January 6, 2023 for Defendant's Opposition to Preliminary Injunction Motion by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Set Deadline: Status Report due by 1/9/2023. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 48
ORDER: The parties shall file another joint status report by January 9, 2023, representing whether they have made progress toward settling this case on their own. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/28/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 47
Joint STATUS REPORT by A.B. Corp.. (Morgan, John)
|
|
Filing 46
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion re: #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Order to Show Cause MOTION for Hearing. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Evidentiary Hearing set for 1/19/2023 at 10:00 AM in North Courtroom, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Sarala V. Nagala. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/20/2022.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 45
ORDER scheduling mediation. This case is scheduled for mediation before Judge Martinez on 1/13/23 at 1pm via Zoom, details for which shall be emailed to counsel. Ex parte submissions in compliance with the attached Order are due no later than 1/6/23. Clients or client representatives with authority must attend and participate in mediation. Participants shall be prepared to spend the remainder of the day in mediation, as required by Judge Martinez. If the case settles prior to 1/13/23, counsel shall notify Judge Martinez immediately. All communications regarding mediation shall be emailed to DFM_SETTLEMENT@ctd.uscourts.gov. SEE ATTACHED for further instructions. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 12/19/22.(Martinez, Donna)
|
|
Filing 44
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez to conduct a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/19/2022.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Set Deadline: Status Report due by 12/22/2022 per 43 order. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Set Deadline as to #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Order to Show Cause MOTION for Hearing. Response due by 1/4/2023. Reply due by 1/11/2023. See 43 order. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 43
ORDER granting #33 granting #33 Defendant's motion in limine, as explained during the status conference on December 15, 2022. Specifically, Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. [1-1], contends that that Defendant's termination of the parties' franchise agreement violated both the substantive and procedural protections of the Connecticut Franchise Act ("CFA"), Conn. Gen. Stat. 42-133e et seq. To prevail on its motion for a preliminary injunction, Plaintiff will need to show either likelihood of success or serious questions on the merits, with respect to either the CFA's substantive or procedural protections, in addition to the other requirements set forth by the Second Circuit. See Moore v. Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., 409 F.3d 506, 510 (2d Cir. 2005). In its brief in support of the motion, and again during the conference yesterday, Plaintiff argued that it had demonstrated likelihood of success on the merits with respect to the procedural defects in Defendant's termination of the franchise agreement. Indeed, in its brief in support of its motion for a preliminary injunction, Plaintiff argued, "[t]here will be a time and place to argue" whether Defendant had good cause to terminate the franchise agreement, but "it is unnecessary to do so at this time." ECF No. 15 at 8 (emphasis added). That representation, plus Plaintiff's lack of meaningful discussion in its brief regarding the substantive good cause standard under the CFA, clearly limits Plaintiff's basis for pursuing a preliminary injunction to the merits of the CFA's procedural protections. Presenting evidence that the termination lacked good cause in the evidentiary hearing, when such argument was effectively abandoned for the purpose of the preliminary injunction motion, would unfairly sandbag Defendant. Thus, Plaintiff will not be permitted to introduce evidence that the termination lacked good cause in support of its motion for a preliminary injunction. Because Plaintiff has limited itself to the CFA's procedural protections, Defendant likewise will not be permitted to introduce evidence that the termination was supported by good cause, as such argument would not obviate any procedural defectiveness of the termination. See Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc., 63 F.3d 1169, 1185, 1187 (2d Cir. 1995) (concluding that the franchisor's termination was supported by good cause but violated the CFA's procedural notice requirement and awarding damages). In sum, neither party will be permitted to present evidence regarding whether the termination was supported by good cause at the evidentiary hearing on Plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. The parties can litigate the good cause issue at a later stage in the case. An evidentiary hearing on the pending motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF No. #6 , is scheduled for January 19, 2023, at 10:00 a.m. By January 4, 2023, Defendant shall file its brief in opposition to Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction. By January 11, 2023, Plaintiff shall file its reply brief in support of its motion for a preliminary injunction, if desired. Also by January 11, 2023, the parties shall file: (1) a joint stipulation of undisputed facts, and (2) separate notices containing listing any witness and exhibits they desire to present for the Court's consideration. If the parties represent that the facts are largely undisputed, or rest on documentary evidence whose admissibility is not challenged, the Court may convert the hearing to an oral argument on the motion for a preliminary injunction. In addition, based on the parties' consent, the Court will refer this case to a U.S. Magistrate Judge for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference on January 13, 2023. In the meantime, by December 22, 2022, the parties shall file a joint status report representing whether they have made progress toward settling this case on their own. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/16/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 51
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sarala V. Nagala: granting #33 in Limine.Motion Hearing held on 12/15/2022 re #33 Emergency MOTION in Limine Regarding No Good Cause for Termination filed by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, Status Conference held on 12/15/2022. 27 minutes (Court Reporter Denae Hovland.) (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 42
NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE.ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference set for 12/15/2022 at 10:00 AM via Zoom before Judge Sarala V. Nagala. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
NOTICE regarding hearing via Zoom: The status conference scheduled for 12/15/2022 at 10:00 AM will be conducted via Zoom. The video link is https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1613726352?pwd=MmdybUExOHRzNVkzTmY1SlFZRGx6dz09 and call in numbers are 1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose) or 1-646-828-7666 US (New York).Meeting ID: 161 372 6352 Meeting Password: 098990Please note: Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, screenshots, streaming, and rebroadcasting in any form, of court proceedings. The Judicial Conference of the United States, which governs the practices of the federal courts, has prohibited it. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 40
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #36 Motion for Extension of Time; granting in part and denying in part #38 Motion to Continue Hearing. All briefing deadlines are hereby vacated. The hearing scheduled for December 15, 2022, at 10:00 a.m., ECF Nos. 18, 21, is canceled. The Court will, however, hold a brief status conference via Zoom on December 15, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. to discuss the outstanding deadlines and reschedule the hearing. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/6/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 39
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses , COUNTERCLAIM against A.B. Corp. by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 38
Consent MOTION to Continue Preliminary Injunction Hearing and Related Briefing Schedule by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 37
NOTICE of Appearance by John F. Verhey on behalf of Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC (Verhey, John)
|
|
Filing 36
MOTION for Extension of Time until January 5, 2023 In response to Motion in Limine by A.B. Corp.. (Morgan, John)
|
|
Filing 35
CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #29 MOTION for Attorney(s) John F. Verhey to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Set Deadline as to #33 Emergency MOTION in Limine Regarding No Good Cause for Termination. Response due by 12/5/2022 at 12:00 PM. Reply due by 12/6/2022 at 12:00 PM. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 34
ORDER. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's emergency motion in limine, ECF No. #33 , by December 5, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. If Defendant desires to file a reply, it must do so by December 6, 2022, at 12:00 p.m. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/1/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 33
Emergency MOTION in Limine Regarding No Good Cause for Termination by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC.Responses due by 12/22/2022 (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 41
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sarala V. Nagala: Motion Hearing held on 11/30/2022 re #19 Second MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order requesting maintenance of pre-suit status quo pending hearing filed by A.B. Corp. 10 minutes (Court Reporter Denae Hovland.) (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 32
ORDER denying #19 Plaintiff's Second Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, for the reasons set forth in the attached Ruling. In advance of the evidentiary hearing scheduled for December 15, 2022, each party shall, by December 12, 2022, file a list of witnesses and exhibits it intends to proffer at the hearing. Also by that date, each party shall submit three courtesy copies of all exhibits to the chambers of the undersigned. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/30/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 31
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion re: #19 Second MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order requesting maintenance of pre-suit status quo pending hearing. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Motion Hearing set for 11/30/2022 at 03:00 PM via Zoom before Judge Sarala V. Nagala. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/29/2022.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER granting #29 Renewed Motion for Attorney John F. Verhey to be admitted pro hac vice. Although Attorney Appleby does not have an office within the District of Connecticut, the renewed motion has established good cause for Attorney Appleby and, by extension, Attorney Verhey, to be exempted from the local office requirement of Local Rule 83.1(c). Certificate of Good Standing due by 1/28/2023. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/29/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 29
MOTION for Attorney(s) John F. Verhey to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Of John F. Verhey Supporting Motion To Admit Visiting Attorney)(Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER denying without prejudice #24 Motion for Attorney John F. Verhey to be admitted pro hac vice. Local Rule 83.1(c) provides: "Unless otherwise ordered by the Court for good cause shown, no visiting lawyer admitted specially under Rule 83.1(d) not having an office for the transaction of business in person within the District of Connecticut shall appear as an attorney of record in any cause without specifying on the record a member of the bar of this Court having an office within the District of Connecticut, upon whom service of all papers shall also be made." Here, the sponsoring attorney, Bethany L. Appleby, lists only an office address in Boston, Massachusetts, and does not list an office address located within the District of Connecticut. Similarly, Attorney Verhey lists only an office address in Chicago, Illinois, and does not list an office address located within the District of Connecticut. Moreover, the motion does not identify good cause to warrant excepting Attorney Verhey from Local Rule 83.1(c). The motion may be refiled in compliance with Local Rule 83.1. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/29/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
NOTICE regarding hearing via Zoom: The motion hearing scheduled for 11/30/2022 at 3:00 PM will be conducted via Zoom. The video link is https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1618144595?pwd=MTJKS05QZUlINVVDcTg1UFZsQXppQT09 and call in numbers are 1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose) or 1-646-828-7666 US (New York).Meeting ID: 161 814 4595 Meeting Password: 529748Please note: Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, screenshots, streaming, and rebroadcasting in any form, of court proceedings. The Judicial Conference of the United States, which governs the practices of the federal courts, has prohibited it. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 27
REPLY to Response to #19 Second MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order requesting maintenance of pre-suit status quo pending hearing filed by A.B. Corp.. (Morgan, John)
|
|
Filing 26
Memorandum in Opposition To Re-Filed Application For Temporary Injunction Pending Heaing - re #19 Second MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order requesting maintenance of pre-suit status quo pending hearing filed by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Irene Pia, #2 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Bethany L. Appleby)(Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER: If Plaintiff desires to file a reply brief in support of its motion for a temporary restraining order at ECF No. #19 , it must do so by November 28, 2022, at 5:00 PM. The Court will hold a hearing on the motion on November 30, 2022, at 3:00 PM via Zoom. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/23/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 24
MOTION for Attorney(s) John F. Verhey to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7148277) by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of John F. Verhey)(Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Set Deadline as to #19 Second MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order requesting maintenance of pre-suit status quo pending hearing. Response due by 11/23/2022 at 7:30 PM. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 23
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 21
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion re: #6 Application for Temporary Injunction, Order to Show Cause, and Request for Emergency Hearing. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Motion Hearing set for 12/15/2022 at 10:00 AM in South Courtroom, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Sarala V. Nagala. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/22/2022.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER: Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's Second Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. #19 , by Wednesday, November 23, 2022, at 7:30 PM. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/22/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 22
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Sarala V. Nagala: Status Conference held on 11/21/2022. 13 minutes(Court Reporter Denae Hovland.) (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Set Deadlines as to #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Order to Show Cause MOTION for Hearing. Response due by 12/5/2022. Reply due by 12/12/2022. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 19
Second MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order requesting maintenance of pre-suit status quo pending hearing by A.B. Corp.. (Morgan, John)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER. As explained during the status conference on November 21, the Court sets the following deadlines pertaining to Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction, ECF No. #6 , which the Court characterizes as seeking a preliminary injunction. Defendant shall respond by December 5, 2022. Plaintiff shall file a reply brief by December 12, 2022. The Court will hold a hearing on the motion on December 15, 2022, at 10 AM. To the extent Plaintiff desires interim injunctive relief during the pendency of its pending motion for a preliminary injunction, Plaintiff may request such relief by filing a motion for a temporary restraining order. As instructed during the status conference, in the event that Plaintiff files a motion for an interim restraining order, Defendant shall respond within 48 hours. Moreover, Plaintiff shall be precise with the relief requested and governing legal standard, given that temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions are distinct forms of relief serving different purposes and requiring particular showings. See Garcia v. Yonkers Sch. Dist., 561 F.3d 97, 107 (2d Cir. 2009) (explaining that "a temporary restraining order serves a purpose different from that of a preliminary injunction," namely, to "preserve an existing situation in statu quo until the court has an opportunity to pass upon the merits of the demand for a preliminary injunction") (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/21/2022. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 17
AFFIDAVIT of Service for CT - Summons, Complaint, Demand for Relief, Application for Temporary Injunction and related dcouments as set forth By CT Marshal Lepito served on Dunkin Donuts Franchising LLC on 11/18/2022, filed by A.B. Corp.. (Morgan, John)
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE of Appearance - MOTION for Leave to Appear in addition to John Morgan, Esq. by A.B. Corp.. (Moriarty, Thomas) Modified on 11/21/2022 to correct title of document (Bozek, M.).
|
|
Filing 15
Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Order to Show Cause MOTION for Hearing filed by A.B. Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Termination Notice, #2 Exhibit B - Franchise Agreement, #3 Exhibit C - Health Dept Reports)(Morgan, John)
|
|
Filing 14
Corporate Disclosure Statement by A.B. Corp.. (Morgan, John)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Morgan on behalf of A.B. Corp. (Morgan, John)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE.ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference set for 11/21/2022 at 11:00 AM via Zoom before Judge Sarala V. Nagala. (Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, #5 Notice (Other) filed by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, #10 Protective Order, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, #4 Notice of Appearance filed by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, #2 Notice (Other) filed by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC, #8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #9 Electronic Filing Order, #6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction MOTION for Order to Show Cause MOTION for Hearing filed by A.B. Corp. Signed by Clerk on 11/18/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/18/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/18/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 8
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/17/2023. Discovery due by 5/20/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 6/24/2023. Signed by Clerk on 11/18/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 11/18/22.(Hushin, Z.)
|
|
Filing 6
Application for Temporary Injunction (Responses due by 12/9/2022, ), Order to Show Cause, and Request for Emergency Hearing by A.B. Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Order)(Hushin, Z.)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC - Notice of Pending Motion - (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Appearance by Bethany L. Appleby on behalf of Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 3
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC identifying Other Affiliate DB Franchising Holding Company, LLC for Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, - Removal Statement - (Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC from Superior Court Judicial District of Hartford at Hartford, case number HHDCV226162620S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7143014, filed by Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Appleby, Bethany)
|
|
Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
NOTICE regarding hearing via Zoom: The status conference scheduled for 11/21/2022 at 11:00 AM will be conducted via Zoom. The video link is https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1610480623?pwd=S3Q3MmNVb1pJOWx5TjJieGJDM2Nydz09 and call in numbers are 1-669-254-5252 US (San Jose) or 1-646-828-7666 US (New York).Meeting ID: 161 048 0623 Meeting Password: 927472Please note: Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, screenshots, streaming, and rebroadcasting in any form, of court proceedings. The Judicial Conference of the United States, which governs the practices of the federal courts, has prohibited it. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. (Bozek, M.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: A.B. Corp. v. Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: A.B. Corp. | |
| Represented By: | John J. Morgan |
| Represented By: | Thomas Peter Moriarty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dunkin' Donuts Franchising LLC | |
| Represented By: | Bethany L. Appleby |
| Represented By: | John F. Verhey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
