Lagares v. Kijakazi
| Diana Yvette Lagares |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv01493 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Michael P Shea |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Social Security Transcripts. (Attachments: #1 Part 2, #2 Part 3, #3 Part 4)(Fernandez, Sixtina) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Kilolo Kijakazi, Diana Yvette Lagares. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/12/2022.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Diana Yvette Lagares Notice, Consent & Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
Filing 10
REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/02/2022.(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 9 DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION: Replaced PDF of #3 Standing Order to correct judge.(Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sixtina Fernandez on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Fernandez, Sixtina) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has fully completed the required information. She asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that Plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia on 11/29/2022. (Garcia, Maria)
|
| Filing 6 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/23/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Scheduling Order Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/23/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/23/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Peterson, M) Modified on 12/1/2022 (Pesta, J.). (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/1/2022: #2 REPLACEMENT PDF) (Pesta, J.).
|
| Answer deadline updated for Kilolo Kijakazi to 1/22/2023. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Diana Yvette Lagares. (Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Diana Yvette Lagares.(Ciccarillo, Dennis) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea and Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia added. Motions referred to Maria E. Garcia. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
