Osterman & Co, Inc v. Pignatello
Plaintiff: Osterman & Co, Inc
Defendant: Thomas Pignatello
Case Number: 3:2022cv01494
Filed: November 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Robert A Richardson
Referring Judge: Alvin W Thompson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2023 Filing 20 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time until February 3, 2023 Submit Rule 246(f) Report of Parties' Planning Meeting by Thomas Pignatello. (Moffett, Rowena)
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER: The parties' Joint Motion for Expedited Discovery and Entry of Standing Protective Order (ECF No. #15 ) is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter the Standing Protective Order, which has not yet been entered. The plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. #8 ) is hereby DENIED as moot. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 01/17/2023. (Frazier, T.)
January 16, 2023 Filing 15 Joint MOTION for Expedited Discovery, Protective Order, and Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint Order by Osterman & Co, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lyke, Adam)
December 6, 2022 Filing 13 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alvin W. Thompson: Status Conference re: Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Motion for Expedited Discovery held on 12/6/2022. Total time: 42 minutes. (Court Reporter Alicia Cayode Kyles.) (Frazier, T.) Modified on 12/9/2022 to correct file date to 12/6/2022 (Ferguson, L.). Modified on 12/13/2022 to edit text (Ferguson, L.).
December 6, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Rowena Amanda Moffett on behalf of Thomas Pignatello (Moffett, Rowena)
December 5, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Osterman & Co, Inc. Thomas Pignatello served on 12/5/2022, answer due 12/26/2022. (Lyke, Adam)
December 2, 2022 Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alvin W. Thompson: Telephonic Status Conference re: efforts to serve the defendant held on 12/2/2022. Total time: 3 minutes (Court Reporter Alicia Cayode Kyles.) (Frazier, T.) Modified on 12/9/2022 to correct file date to 12/2/2022. (Ferguson, L.).
December 2, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Hearing to Discuss Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. #8 ) and Motion to Expedite Discovery (ECF No. #7 ) set for 12/6/2022 02:00 PM before Judge Alvin W. Thompson. NOTICE regarding hearing via Zoom: The Hearing to Discuss Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. #8 ) and Motion to Expedite Discovery (ECF No. #7 ) scheduled for 12/6/2022 at 02:00 PM will be conducted via Zoom. The video link is https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1613179995?pwd=bUpsQzhmeUZJdGZFM0ZSQzBBaHlNQT09 and call in number is +1 551 285 1373. Meeting ID: 161 317 9995 Passcode: 490633 Please note: Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, screenshots, streaming, and rebroadcasting in any form, of court proceedings. The Judicial Conference of the United States, which governs the practices of the federal courts, has prohibited it. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. (Frazier, T.)
December 2, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE.ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference set for 12/2/2022 04:30 PM before Judge Alvin W. Thompson. Dial-in instructions have been emailed to counsel of record. Anyone wishing to observe this proceeding should contact chambers at 860-240-3224 to request the dial-in instructions. (Frazier, T.)
November 28, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Corrected Doc. 6--Signed by Osterman & Co, Inc.Responses due by 12/19/2022 (Lyke, Adam)
November 28, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION to Expedite Discovery by Osterman & Co, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Lyke, Adam)
November 28, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and for Temporary Restraining Order by Osterman & Co, Inc.Responses due by 12/19/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Affidavit of David Dwyer, #3 Affidavit of Jason Siwik, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B, #6 Exhibit C, #7 Exhibit D, #8 Exhibit E, #9 Exhibit F, #10 Text of Proposed Order)(Lyke, Adam)
November 28, 2022 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Thomas Pignatello* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Adam James Lyke* *Zangari Cohn Cuthbertson Duhl & Grello P.C.* *59 Elm St., Suite 400* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Barry, L)
November 27, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn A. Duhl on behalf of Osterman & Co, Inc (Duhl, Glenn)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 11/23/2022. (Barry, L)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 11/23/2022. (Barry, L)
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/22/2023 Discovery due by 5/25/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 6/29/2023 Signed by Clerk on 11/23/2022. (Barry, L)
November 23, 2022 Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 11/23/22.(Hushin, Z.)
November 23, 2022 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Osterman & Co, Inc. (Lyke, Adam)
November 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Verified against Thomas Pignatello ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7147796.), filed by Osterman & Co, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Exhibit A)(Lyke, Adam)
November 23, 2022 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Thomas Pignatello. (Lyke, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osterman & Co, Inc v. Pignatello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Osterman & Co, Inc
Represented By: Adam James Lyke
Represented By: Glenn A. Duhl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Pignatello
Represented By: Rowena Amanda Moffett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?