Mulligan v. SOC Office of Policy and Management
| Joseph A. Mulligan |
| SOC Office of Policy and Management |
| 3:2022cv01500 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert M Spector |
| Omar A Williams |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Response to Ruling on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Initial Review Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 #12 Recommended Ruling filed by Joseph A. Mulligan. (Barry, L) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph A. Mulligan. (Barry, L) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/11/2023: #1 Envelope) (Barry, L) |
Filing 12
RECOMMENDED RULING: As set forth in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Court respectfully recommends that the plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis be DENIED, without prejudice to refiling. If the plaintiff wishes to pursue in forma pauperis status, on or before February 3, 2023, he must file a new financial affidavit listing all of prior federal actions he has filed. The Court further recommends that the plaintiffs action be dismissed with prejudice as to any claims regarding state FOI requests. Lastly, the Court recommends dismissing without prejudice to refiling any claims involving (1) potential abuse by the defendant as described above and (2) potential employment discrimination claims against OPM.The defendant must file an Amended Complaint that sets forth a clear statement of the jurisdiction and facts supporting his claims against the defendant by February 3, 2023. Any amended complaint must comply with the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure and must be captioned Amended Complaint. The plaintiff is advised that any amended complaint will completely supersede the current Complaint and must include all allegations against the defendant, such that the Amended Complaint may stand alone as the sole Complaint in the action. This is a recommended ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1). Any objections to this recommended ruling must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days after filing of such order. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2(a). Any party receiving notice or an order or recommended ruling from the Clerk by mail shall have five (5) additional days to file any objection. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2(a). Failure to file a timely objection will preclude appellate review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Rules 6(a) & 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2; Impala v. United States Dept. of Justice, 670 F. Appx 32 (2d Cir. 2016) (summary order) (failure to file timely objection to Magistrate Judges recommended ruling will preclude further appeal to Second Circuit); Small v. Secretary of H.H.S., 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam). 11 Pages. Objections due by 1/18/2023 Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on January 4, 2023.(Salguero, Carlos)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector for ruling on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 12/21/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. SELF-REPRESENTED FILERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE'S STANDARD ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER WHICH IS ATTACHED. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 12/14/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting Motion to Participate in Electronic Filing, ECF No. 3. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 12/14/22. (Codeanne, K.)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 11/22/2022. (Barry, L) |
|
Filing 7
Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 11/22/2022. (Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 11/22/2022. (Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/21/2023 Discovery due by 5/24/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 6/28/2023 Signed by Clerk on 11/22/2022. (Barry, L)
|
| Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Electronic Notice, by Joseph A. Mulligan. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Order by Self-Represented Litigant To Participate in Electronic Filing, by Joseph A. Mulligan. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Joseph A. Mulligan. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SOC Office of Policy and Management, filed by Joseph A. Mulligan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Mendez, D) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mulligan v. SOC Office of Policy and Management | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joseph A. Mulligan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SOC Office of Policy and Management | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
