Marchio v. Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff: Bruno Marchio
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Case Number: 3:2022cv01505
Filed: November 28, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2023 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Fanelle, N.)
May 16, 2023 Filing 25 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Joint with Prejudice by Starbucks Corporation. (Mule, Nicole)
March 14, 2023 Filing 24 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Donna F. Martinez: Settlement Conference held on 3/14/2023. The parties made substantial progress. By the close of business on 3/20/23, counsel shall submit to Judge Martinez (DFM_SETTLEMENT@CTD.USCOURTS.GOV) a report on the status of their negotiations. Total Time: 2 hours and 30 minutes (Martinez, Donna)
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER regarding mediation: Defendant has requested, by email, until 3/10/23 to submit its ex parte memorandum. The request is granted. Requests for extension of additional time are discouraged but, if made, shall be made by formal motion, filed on the docket, with notice to other parties. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 3/6/23.(Martinez, Donna)
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER scheduling mediation: Mediation is scheduled for 3/14/23 at 1pm via Zoom, details for which shall be emailed to counsel. Ex parte submissions in compliance with the attached Order shall be emailed to DFM_SETTLEMENT@ctd.uscourts.gov by no later than 3/7/23. Clients or client representatives with authority must attend. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 2/8/23.(Martinez, Donna)
February 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER regarding mediation. This case was referred to Judge Martinez for mediation. Counsel were ordered to submit by 2/3/23 three agreed-upon proposed dates when counsel and clients with authority to settle are available for mediation. They did not comply. Counsel are reminded to submit those proposed dates to Judge Martinez (DFM_SETTLEMENT@CTD.USCOURTS.GOV) without further delay. If counsel agree that mediation at this time would be unproductive, they should include that information in their submission. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 2/7/23.(Martinez, Donna)
January 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER regarding mediation: This case has been referred to Judge Martinez for mediation. To aid in scheduling, by no later than 2/3/23, counsel shall submit to DFM_SETTLEMENT@ctd.uscourts.gov 3 agreed-upon proposed dates when counsel and clients with authority to settle are available. Judge Martinez intends to hold mediation via Zoom beginning at 1pm and continuing as needed. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 1/31/23.(Martinez, Donna)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/30/2023.(Gould, K.)
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 STANDING ORDER ON JOINT TRIAL MEMORANDA. See attached. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/30/2023. (Bernard, Hannah)
January 30, 2023 Filing 17 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. Telephonic Status Conference set for October 27, 2023 at 11:00 AM before Judge Kari A. Dooley. (Bernard, Hannah) Conference Line: 888-278-0296Access Code: 807-7899
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Order on Pretrial Deadlines. The Court has reviewed the parties' #15 Rule 26(f) Report. It is Approved, Adopted, and So Ordered, except that the parties' joint trial memorandum shall be filed in accordance with the procedure set forth below. Pursuant to Local Rule 16(b), the Court orders as follows: The Defendant shall move to join additional parties by February 3, 2023. All discovery shall be concluded by October 20, 2023. Dispositive motions, if any (see Local Rule 56(c)), shall be filed by December 20, 2023. The Court will set a date for filing a joint trial memorandum after the close of discovery. The joint trial memorandum shall comport with this Court's standing order, which will be separately docketed. A telephonic status conference is scheduled for October 27, 2023 at 11:00AM. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 1/30/2023. (Bernard, Hannah)
January 30, 2023 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Amended Pleadings due by 2/3/2023; Discovery due by 10/20/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 12/20/2023;Telephonic Status Conference set for 10/27/2023 at 11:00 AM(Bernard, Hannah)
January 27, 2023 Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Mule, Nicole)
January 6, 2023 Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Starbucks Corporation.(Cardin, Kelly)
November 29, 2022 Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until January 6, 2023 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 Notice of Removal filed by Starbucks Corporation, #10 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Starbucks Corporation, #5 Notice (Other) filed by Starbucks Corporation, #6 Notice (Other) filed by Starbucks Corporation, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Starbucks Corporation, #12 Protective Order, #9 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Starbucks Corporation, #3 Notice of Appearance filed by Starbucks Corporation Signed by Clerk on 11/29/2022. (Attachments: #1 standing order on removed cases) (Fanelle, N.)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant shall respond to the Complaint on or before January 6, 2023. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/29/2022. (Bernard, Hannah)
November 29, 2022 Answer deadline updated for Starbucks Corporation to 1/6/2023. (Bernard, Hannah)
November 28, 2022 Filing 12 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Clerk on 11/28/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
November 28, 2022 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Clerk on 11/28/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/27/2023 Discovery due by 5/30/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 7/4/2023 Signed by Clerk on 11/28/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
November 28, 2022 Filing 8 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 11/28/2022.(Anastasio, F.)
November 28, 2022 Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until January 6, 2023 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 Notice of Removal by Starbucks Corporation. (Mule, Nicole)
November 28, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE by Starbucks Corporation of Statement Pursuant to the United States District Court District of CT Standing Order on Removed Cases (Mule, Nicole)
November 28, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE by Starbucks Corporation of No Pending Motions (Mule, Nicole)
November 28, 2022 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Starbucks Corporation. (Mule, Nicole)
November 28, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly Marie Cardin on behalf of Starbucks Corporation (Cardin, Kelly)
November 28, 2022 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole S. Mule on behalf of Starbucks Corporation (Mule, Nicole)
November 28, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Starbucks Corporation from Connecticut Superior Court, case number NNH-CV-22-6127728-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7149458, filed by Starbucks Corporation.(Mule, Nicole)
November 28, 2022 Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Freberg, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marchio v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bruno Marchio
Represented By: John Erich Sheer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By: Kelly Marie Cardin
Represented By: Nicole S. Mule
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?