Giovinco v. Pullen
Charles Anthony Giovinco |
Timethea Pullen |
3:2022cv01515 |
November 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Robert A Richardson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 TRAVERSE re #7 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Charles Anthony Giovinco. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE TO #5 Order to Show Cause,, by Timethea Pullen filed by Timethea Pullen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Criminal Judgment, #2 Exhibit B - Sentence Computation)(McConaghy, Michelle) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Lynn McConaghy on behalf of Timethea Pullen (McConaghy, Michelle) |
Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Upon the petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed on November 29, 2022, it is hereby ORDERED that the Respondent file a response on or before January 20, 2023, why the relief prayed for in the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted, and it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve a copy of this Order and a copy of the petition and all attachments, to Respondents' representative, Assistant United States Attorney Michelle McConaghy, by e-mail to the Office of the United States Attorney on or before December 22, 2022. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/13/2022.(Bartlett, Hannah) |
Filing fee received from Maria GioVinco: $ 5.00, receipt number BPT13401 (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/29/2022.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/29/2022.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Shafer, J.) |
Filing 2 ORDER: We received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus which has been assigned case number 3:22cv1515. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 12/29/2022 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 12/29/2022. Signed by Clerk on 11/29/2022. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Charles Anthony Giovinco. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Envelope) (Peterson, M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Giovinco v. Pullen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Charles Anthony Giovinco | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Timethea Pullen | |
Represented By: | Michelle Lynn McConaghy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.