Betts v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Latoya Lee Betts
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2022cv01604
Filed: December 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Robert A Richardson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2023 Filing 15 MOTION to Remand to Agency by Commissioner of Social Security. (Carter, Molly)
February 10, 2023 Filing 14 Social Security Transcripts. (Carter, Molly)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 1/9/23.(Blue, A.)
January 6, 2023 Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Latoya Lee Betts, Commissioner of Social Security. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 1/6/2023.(Anastasio, F.)
January 5, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE by Latoya Lee Betts Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge (Olinsky, Howard)
January 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has fully completed the required information. She asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that Plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint, ECF No. 1, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 1/5/23. (Esposito, A.)
January 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeal Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 1/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
January 3, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Molly E Carter on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Carter, Molly)
December 19, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: In accord with the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Review Actions Under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), effective December 1, 2022, a new Standing Order on Social Security Cases governing cases filed on or after December 1, 2022 has been filed in this case. Please note the deadlines set forth therein. Signed by Clerk on 12/19/22.(Ruocco, M.)
December 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER RE: SOCIAL SECURITY CASES Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/19/22.(Ruocco, M.)
December 16, 2022 Filing 7 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Peterson, M)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/16/2022. (Peterson, M)
December 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Peterson, M)
December 16, 2022 Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 2/14/2023. (Peterson, M)
December 16, 2022 Judge Michael P. Shea and Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.)
December 16, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Latoya Lee Betts. (Olinsky, Howard)
December 16, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Latoya Lee Betts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeal Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olinsky, Howard)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Betts v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latoya Lee Betts
Represented By: Howard D. Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Molly E Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?