Cenatiempo v. Leonard
| Cynthia Lynn Cenatiempo |
| Elizabeth Leonard |
| 3:2022cv01640 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Elizabeth Leonard Notice of Pending Motions (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert C.E. Laney on behalf of Elizabeth Leonard (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Elizabeth Leonard Statement in Support of Removal (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Protective Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement,, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Elizabeth Leonard, #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 12/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 standing order on removed cases) (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/27/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/27/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/25/2023 Discovery due by 6/28/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 8/2/2023. Signed by Clerk on 12/27/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 12/27/22.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Elizabeth Leonard from Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk, case number FST-CV-22-6059181-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7180049, filed by Elizabeth Leonard.(Laney, Robert) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Hushin, Z.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cenatiempo v. Leonard | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cynthia Lynn Cenatiempo | |
| Represented By: | Andrea Christine Sisca |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Elizabeth Leonard | |
| Represented By: | Robert C.E. Laney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
