Speciale v. Citibank, N.A.
| Virginia Speciale |
| Citibank, N.A. |
| 3:2022cv01644 |
| December 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time and #15 Motion to Stay. The Defendant's deadline to respond to the complaint is extended to 2/27/2023. The Rule 26(f) requirements are stayed until 14 days after the adjudication of the motion to compel. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 2/9/2024. (Burlingham, Corinne)
|
| Answer deadline updated to 2-27-2023 per Dkt. 16 Order. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 15 Consent MOTION to Stay or Extend Rule 26 Deadlines by Citibank, N.A..Responses due by 2/22/2023 (Kolakowski, Pierre-Yves) |
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until February 27, 2023 plead, move or otherwise respond to Complaint by Citibank, N.A.. (Kolakowski, Pierre-Yves) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time. The Defendant's response deadline is extended to February 6, 2023. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 1/3/2023. (Burlingham, Corinne)
|
| Answer deadline updated to 2-6-2023 per Dkt. 13 Order. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Citibank, N.A. of Notice of Removal, Notice of appearance, Corporate Disclosure Statement, Notice of Pending motions, motion for an extension of time to respond to complaint and various Court orders and related documents by mail on December 29, 2022 (Kolakowski, Pierre-Yves) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Citibank, N.A., #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Citibank, N.A., #5 Notice (Other) filed by Citibank, N.A., #3 Notice of Appearance filed by Citibank, N.A., 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement,, #10 Order, #9 Protective Order, #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until February 6, 2023to Plead, move or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint filed by Citibank, N.A., #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #8 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 12/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order On Removed Cases) (Mendez, D) |
|
Filing 10
Order re: Chambers Practices. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 12/28/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 12/28/2022.(Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 12/28/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/26/2023. Discovery due by 6/29/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 8/3/2023. Signed by Clerk on 12/28/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until February 6, 2023to Plead, move or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint by Citibank, N.A.. (Kolakowski, Pierre-Yves) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Citibank, N.A. of Pending Motions (Kolakowski, Pierre-Yves) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Citibank, N.A. identifying Corporate Parent Citigroup Inc. for Citibank, N.A.. (Kolakowski, Pierre-Yves) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Pierre-Yves Kolakowski on behalf of Citibank, N.A. (Kolakowski, Pierre-Yves) |
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 12/28/22.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Citibank, N.A. from Superior Court, J.D. of Fairfield, case number FBT-CV23-6119954-S., Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7180899 filed by Citibank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Redacted, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hushin, Z.) Modified on 12/28/2022 to add receipt information (Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Vanessa L. Bryant and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Hushin, Z.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Speciale v. Citibank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Virginia Speciale | |
| Represented By: | James A. Lenes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Citibank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Pierre-Yves Kolakowski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
