In Re: Grand Jury Investigation
| USA |
| Grand Jury Investigation |
| Interested Party |
| 3:2022mc00007 |
| February 17, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SEALED MOTION by Interested Party. (Attachments: #1 Sealed Affidavit, #2 Certificate)(Gould, K.) |
| Filing 9 SEALED MOTION to Seal and Proposed Order by Interested Party. (Gould, K.) |
| Filing 8 SEALED MOTION to Seal by Interested Party. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 7 Sealed Document: Response by Interested Party to #1 SEALED MOTION for Curcio Hearing. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Seal by Interested Party. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Proposed Order)(Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance of Douglas M. Tween for Interested Party. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Seal. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/23/2022. (Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 2/17/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 2 SEALED MOTION to Seal by USA. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 1 SEALED MOTION for Curcio Hearing by USA. (Fanelle, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
