Picard v. Schafter
| Michael Picard |
| Justin Delarm |
| Stephen Schafter |
| 3:2022mc00086 |
| November 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Robert M Spector |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER finding as moot Justin Delarm's Motion to Quash (Doc. No. #1 ): In the attached Order, the Court adopts the parties' proposed Stipulated Order for Production of Electronically Stored Information in Response to Rule 45 Subpoena (Doc. No. #14 ). Accordingly, the Court finds as moot Mr. Delarm's Motion to Quash (Doc. No. #1 ). Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on December 22, 2022. (Briskin, Corey)
|
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION re 11 Order on Motion to Quash,,, by Justin Delarm. (Radshaw, John) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting the parties' Joint Motion to Extend Time (Doc. No. #12 ): For the reasons stated by the parties in their Joint Motion to Extend Time (Doc. No. #12 ), the Court GRANTS the motion and extends the deadline for Mr. Delarm's counsel to file a joint proposed stipulated order outlining a protocol for production of the ESI sought in the subpoena, as well as a plan for apportioning the costs of its extraction and review, until December 22, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on December 19, 2022. (Briskin, Corey)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time until 12/22/2022 to file proposed joint stipulation 11 Order on Motion to Quash,,, by Justin Delarm. (Radshaw, John) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER taking under advisement Justin Delarm's Motion to Quash (Doc. No. #1 ): In light of the parties' agreement during today's conference to work together to resolve the issues raised in Justin Delarm's Motion to Quash (Doc. No. #1 ), the Court takes the motion under advisement. As discussed during the conference, the Court directs the parties to draft a proposed Joint Stipulated Order outlining a protocol for production of the ESI sought in the subpoena, as well as a plan for apportioning the costs of its extraction and review. Once the parties have agreed on the terms of the proposed Joint Stipulated Order, the Court directs counsel for Mr. Delarm to file it on the record on or before December 19, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on December 7, 2022. (Briskin, Corey)
|
| Filing 10 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert M. Spector: Discovery Conference held on 12/7/2022. 22 minutes (Court Reporter CourtSmart.) (Langello, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 Memorandum in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by Michael Picard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Mendez, D) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. An on-the-record discovery conference via Zoom is scheduled for 12/7/2022 at 11:00am before Judge Robert M. Spector. (Briskin, Corey) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: The Court sets the following briefing schedule regarding the Motion to Quash (Doc. No. #1 ) filed by Justin Delarm: responses due on or before November 30, 2022; reply due on or before December 5, 2022. The Court intends to resolve the disputes raised in the motion during an on-the-record discovery conference via Zoom, which is scheduled for December 7, 2022. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on November 16, 2022. (Briskin, Corey)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector for a ruling on #1 MOTION to Quash. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/16/2022.Motions referred to Robert M. Spector(Bozek, M.)
|
| NOTICE regarding hearing via Zoom: The Discovery Conference scheduled for 12/07/2022 at 11:00am will be conducted via Zoom. The video link is https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1605726381?pwd=ampvYmRnMlhITU9pOG5wTC8wQndEQT09 and call in number is (551) 285-1373.Meeting ID: 160 572 6381 Meeting Password: 599704Please note: Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, screenshots, streaming, and rebroadcasting in any form, of court proceedings. The Judicial Conference of the United States, which governs the practices of the federal courts, has prohibited it. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed necessary by the court. (Briskin, Corey) |
| Filing 5 MOTION By Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing by Michael Picard. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 4 Consent to Electronic Notice by Michael Picard (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case by Justin Delarm (Radshaw, John) |
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 11/6/2022. (Mendez, D)
|
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash [Filing fee: $49.00; receipt number ACTDC-7127542] filed by Justin Delarm. Responses due by 11/27/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Wells Fargo case, #6 Pinehave case, #7 Buckley Towers case)(Radshaw, John) Modified on 11/7/2022 to add receipt information(Hushin, Z.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
