Roundtree-McCrorey et al v. Governor's Foot Guard et al
| Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey, Andrew McCrorey, III and McCrorey Family Heirs |
| Governor's Foot Guard, Arthur W. Gruhn and Department of Transportation |
| 3:2023cv00104 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Omar A Williams |
| Other Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Docket Entry Correction re 9 Order to Show Cause: Entered in error. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. On February 6, 2023, the court entered an order to show cause as to why the action should not be dismissed. Plaintiff has not filed any objection or other response to the show cause order by the deadline of March 6, 2023. In the absence of any objection or response, the court hereby dismisses this action for the reasons stated in the court's order to show cause, and where the complaint is subject to dismissal under 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) hereby is denied. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 3/8/2023. (Mamillapalli, S.).
|
|
Filing 9
ENTERED IN ERROR: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e), courts are required to dismiss any action that is frivolous or that fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The complaint seems to allege that the defendants have used unlawful tactics to deprive Plaintiff of her assets and her rights, but it is not clear what rights were infringed or what assets taken, or even the events leading to the deprivation. The court cannot discern a cognizable claim in the allegations. Moreover, it is not clear that, even if there is a cognizable claim, federal jurisdiction is proper. Therefore, Plaintiff is instructed to show cause on or before April 5, 2023, why this case should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 03/08/23. (Codeanne, K.) Modified on 3/9/2023 to indicate entered in error (Velez, F.).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Under 28 U.S.C. section 1915(e), courts are required to dismiss any action that is frivolous or that fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The complaint seems to allege that the defendants have used unlawful tactics to deprive Plaintiffs of their assets and their rights, but it is not clear what rights were infringed or what assets taken, or even the events leading to the deprivation. The court cannot discern a cognizable claim in the allegations. Moreover, it is not clear that, even if there is a cognizable claim, federal jurisdiction is proper. Therefore, Plaintiffs are instructed to show cause on or before March 6, 2023, why this case should not be dismissed. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of the action. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 2/6/2023. (Mamillapalli, S.).
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 1/26/2023. (Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 6
Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 1/26/2023. (Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/27/2023 Discovery due by 7/28/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 9/1/2023 Signed by Clerk on 1/26/2023. (Barry, L)
|
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 1/26/2023. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 3 Consent to Electronic Notice by Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Governor's Foot Guard, Arthur W. Gruhn, Department of Transportation, filed by Anjaknie Roundtree-McCrorey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Peterson, M) |
| Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Shafer, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
