Jusino v. Reis et al
Jose A. Jusino |
Jennifer Reis, Nick Rodrigues, Angel Quiros, William Mulligan, Carlos Nunez, Lalitha Pieri, Damian Doran, Wolf-Craig and Dougherty |
3:2023cv00132 |
February 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Stefan R Underhill |
S Dave Vatti |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Jose A. Jusino. Responses due by 3/23/2023 (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Jose A. Jusino. Responses due by 3/8/2023 (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jose A. Jusino. (Oliver, T.) |
![]() |
Filing 11 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jose A. Jusino. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 10 Prisoner Authorization Form by Jose A. Jusino. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jose A. Jusino. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, he seeks to commence a federal lawsuit without pre-paying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits him to do so if, among other things, he submits a financial affidavit showing that he is unable to pay, accompanied by a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six month period preceding his complaint. To assist inmates in demonstrating inability to pay, the District of Connecticut has prepared a standard-form in forma pauperis application.In this case, the plaintiff submitted the wrong in forma pauperis application form. He also did not submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. His application is therefore insufficient. The Court notes that it came to the same conclusion on February 2, 2023 in the plaintiffs similar in forma pauperis application in 23-cv-126 (SRU). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send the plaintiff a blank copy of the correct application form at his address of record. The plaintiff is directed to fill out the form completely and accurately, and to file it with the Clerk of the Court along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement covering at least the period from August 1, 2022 to February 1, 2023. If he does not do so by February 24, 2023, his case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 2/7/2023.(Corriette, M.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Local Rule 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/1/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jose A. Jusino. (Samson, Jessalyn) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jose A. Jusino. (Samson, Jessalyn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jose A. Jusino.(Samson, Jessalyn) |
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Shafer, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.