Ramos v. New Benevis, Inc.
| Pedro Luis Ramos, III |
| New Benevis, Inc. and New Benevis, Inc |
| 3:2023cv00184 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Omar A Williams |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint against New Benevis, Inc, filed by Pedro Luis Ramos, III.(Petela, Michael) |
Filing 26
ORDER - A settlement conference is scheduled for June 2, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. with Judge Farrish. Please see attached order for important instructions. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/7/23.(Wood, R.)
|
| Filing 25 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Thomas O. Farrish: Telephonic Pre-Settlement Conference held on 4/6/2023. Time 10 minutes (Wood, R.) |
|
Filing 24
Telephonic pre-settlement conference has been rescheduled to April 6, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Thomas O. Farrish, re 23 Order. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/4/23.(Wood, R.)
|
|
Filing 23
Telephonic pre-settlement conference set for April 5, 2023 at 4:30 p.m. before Judge Thomas O. Farrish. Telephone connection information will be e-mailed to all appearing counsel by Judge Farrish's courtroom deputy at their e-mail address of record.A date for the settlement conference will be set during the telephone call. Because the parties will likely be ordered to attend the conference, either in-person or via videoconference, counsel are instructed to obtain their client's schedules over the next ninety days and have them available during the pre-conference. Counsel should also have their own calendars available to aid in scheduling. During the telephone call, counsel should be prepared to discuss what, if any, information needs to be exchanged and anything else that needs to be accomplished prior to the settlement conference to maximize its chances of success.If either counsel has a firm, unavoidable conflict at the appointed date and time, e.g., a previously-scheduled appearance in another court, s/he should not file a motion for continuance on the docket but rather should call Chambers at 860-240-3605 as soon as possible with opposing counsel on the line to work out an alternate day and time for the pre-conference with Judge Farrish's law clerk. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/3/23.(Wood, R.)
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 3/31/23. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER denying #19 MOTION to Strike. Defendant has filed an offer of judgment under seal. See ECF No. #16 . Plaintiff seeks to strike that document on the grounds that Defendant has failed to comply with the Local Rules, which require all sealed judicial documents to be accompanied by a motion to seal. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 5(e) ("No judicial document shall be filed under seal, except upon entry of an order of the Court either acting sua sponte or specifically granting a request to seal that document."). Because the offer of judgment is not a judicial document (i.e. a document relevant to the performance of a judicial function and useful to the judicial process), Defendant need not have filed a motion to seal at the time it filed the offer of judgment. See Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006) (defining judicial document). The court will never utilize an offer of judgment in adjudicating any case. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 3/31/2023. (Mamillapalli, S.).
|
|
Filing 20
SCHEDULING ORDER. The court thanks the parties for submitting their Rule 26(f) Planning Report, see ECF No. #18 , and hereby ADOPTS all deadlines proposed therein, as modified by this order. The following pretrial deadlines are scheduled as follows:All discovery shall be completed on or before August 15, 2023, and all interim discovery deadlines hereby are incorporated by reference. Dispositive motions shall be filed on or before September 19, 2023. The parties' joint trial memorandum shall be filed by October 15, 2023 in the event that no dispositive motions are filed. If dispositive motions are filed, the court will set a deadline for the joint trial memorandum at the time it disposes of any such motions. The case shall be trial ready by October 30, 2023.In their report, the parties request an early settlement conference. The Clerk of Court kindly is instructed to refer this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for purposes of a settlement conference. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 3/31/2023. (Mamillapalli, S.).
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to Strike #16 Sealed Document by Pedro Luis Ramos, III.Responses due by 4/20/2023 (Hayber, Richard) |
| Filing 18 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Greene, Kevin) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by New Benevis, Inc re #16 Sealed Document NOTICE OF SERVICE OF OFFER OF JUDGMENT (Greene, Kevin) |
| Filing 16 Sealed Document: OFFER OF JUDGMENT by New Benevis, Inc . (Greene, Kevin) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by New Benevis, Inc.(Greene, Kevin) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael T. Petela, Jr on behalf of Pedro Luis Ramos, III (Petela, Michael) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas J. Durkin on behalf of Pedro Luis Ramos, III (Durkin, Thomas) |
| Answer deadline updated for New Benevis, Inc to 3/28/2023. (Velez, F.) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 MOTION for Extension of Time. Defendant's response to the complaint is due on or before March 28, 2022. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 3/8/2023. (Mamillapalli, S.).
|
| Set Deadline: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/20/2023. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until March 28, 2023 to Respond to #1 Complaint by New Benevis, Inc. (Greene, Kevin) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by New Benevis, Inc. (Greene, Kevin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin J. Greene on behalf of New Benevis, Inc (Greene, Kevin) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pedro Luis Ramos, III. All Defendants. (Hayber, Richard) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *New Benevis, Inc* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Richard Eugene Hayber* *Hayber, McKenna & Dinsemore, LLC* *750 Main Street, Suite 904* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Barry, L) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement,, #1 Complaint filed by Pedro Luis Ramos, III, #5 Protective Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 2/14/2023. (Barry, L) |
|
Filing 5
Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 2/13/2023. (Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 2/13/2023. (Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/14/2023 Discovery due by 8/15/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 9/19/2023 Signed by Clerk on 2/13/2023. (Barry, L)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/13/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7235817.), filed by Pedro Luis Ramos, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hayber, Richard) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Hayber, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
