Amoakoh v. Allied Universal Security Services, LLC et al
| Andrew Amoakoh |
| Allied Universal Security Services, LLC, CIGNA Corporation and Universal Protection Service, LLC |
| 3:2023cv00198 |
| February 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Robert M Spector |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family & Medical Leave Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Universal Protection Service, LLC waiver sent on 3/16/2023, answer due 5/15/2023 filed by Andrew Amoakoh. (Reilly, Michael) |
Filing 12
ORDER denying #9 Motion for Extension of Time. The original complaint in this action was filed on February 16, 2023. On that same date, the Clerk of Court issued a summons pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Since then, an amended complaint has been docketed. A defendant must answer or otherwise respond to a complaint within 21 days of being served with the necessary papers or, if the defendant waives service of process, within 60 days of the date the waiver of process form was sent to the defendant. Here, Defendants' motion represents that Defendant Allied Universal would waive service of summons of the amended complaint if the Court granted Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint, which the Court has done. Accordingly, Defendant Allied Universal will have 60 days from the date that the waiver is sent to respond to the amended complaint. Plaintiff shall promptly docket the executed waiver of service form, at which time the Court will set a deadline of 60 days from the date the waiver form was sent as the response deadline for Defendant Allied Universal.Separately, no representation is made in Defendants' motion that Defendant Cigna Corporation will waive service of summons. Since no proof of service has been docketed as to this Defendant, however, there is currently no deadline to respond to the amended complaint. When Plaintiff dockets an executed service of process form or, alternatively, an executed waiver of service of summons form, the Court will set an appropriate response deadline for Defendant Cigna Corporation. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 3/10/23. (Marks, Joshua)
|
| Set Deadline: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/22/2023. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Allied Universal Security Services, LLC, CIGNA Corporation, filed by Andrew Amoakoh.(Reilly, Michael) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Amend. Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint as a standalone document no later than March 15, 2023. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 3/9/23. (Marks, Joshua)
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT by Allied Universal Security Services, LLC. and CIGNA Corporation (Cheverko, Geraldine) Modified on 3/10/2023 to correct filers (Bozek, M.). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Andrew Amoakoh.Responses due by 3/29/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proposed Amended Complaint (Redline), #2 Exhibit B - Proposed Amended Complaint)(Reilly, Michael) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Allied Universal Security Services, LLC, CIGNA Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael John Reilly* *Cicchiello & Cicchiello, LLP* *364 Franklin Avenue* *Hartford, CT 06114*. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Andrew Amoakoh, #5 Protective Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement,, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 2/16/2023. (Mendez, D) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 2/16/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 2/16/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/17/2023. Discovery due by 8/18/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 9/22/2023. Signed by Clerk on 2/16/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/16/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Allied Universal Security Services, LLC, CIGNA Corporation ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7239682.), filed by Andrew Amoakoh.(Reilly, Michael) Modified on 2/16/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Allied Universal Security Services, LLC, CIGNA Corporation. (Reilly, Michael) Modified on 2/16/2023 to correct party(Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
