LaFerriere v. Raymond Corporation
Michael LaFerriere |
The Raymond Corporation and Raymond Corporation |
3:2023cv00224 |
February 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Robert A Richardson |
Stefan R Underhill |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER granting #20 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Thomas G. Wood, Esq. Certificate of Good Standing due by 6/12/2023. Signed by Clerk on 4/13/2023. (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 20 MOTION for Attorney(s) Thomas G. Wood to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7309123) by Michael LaFerriere. (Levin, Paul) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Attorney(s) Raymond D. Jamieson to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7295595) by Raymond Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Claflin, Mark) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Evan Thomsen on behalf of Raymond Corporation (Thomsen, Evan) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Rule 26(f) Meeting Report due by 5/12/2023. (Khabbaz, D.) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Levin on behalf of Michael LaFerriere (Levin, Paul) |
Filing 16 ORDER granting #15 Motion for Attorney Evan W. Thomsen to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Certificate of Good Standing due by 5/22/2023. Signed by Clerk on 3/23/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 15 MOTION for Attorney(s) Evan W. Thomsen to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7282337) by Raymond Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Evan W. Thomsen)(Claflin, Mark) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE US DISTRICT COURT OF CONNECTICUT Re: Local Rule 83.1 Admission of Attorneys. The above captioned case has been received and filed in our court. Please see our Local Rule 83.1 regarding Admission of Attorneys that is available on our website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. You will not be added to the case, nor will we accept further filings until you have complied with Local Rule 83.1. If you have any questions about this procedure, please contact the Clerk's Office. Signed by Clerk on 2/22/2023.(Oliver, T.) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 9 Notice re: Disclosure Statement,, #7 Jury Demand filed by Raymond Corporation, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Raymond Corporation, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Raymond Corporation, #12 Protective Order, #8 Notice (Other) filed by Raymond Corporation, #5 Notice (Other) filed by Raymond Corporation, #4 Notice (Other) filed by Raymond Corporation, #10 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Notice (Other) filed by Raymond Corporation, #11 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Raymond Corporation Signed by Clerk on 2/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order) (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 12 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/21/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/21/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 10 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/22/2023 Discovery due by 8/23/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 9/27/2023 Signed by Clerk on 2/21/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 9 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/21/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 8 NOTICE by Raymond Corporation Notice to Counsel and Pro Se Parties re Local Rule 5 (b) (Claflin, Mark) Modified on 2/22/2023 to correct party(Hushin, Z.). |
Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Raymond Corporation. (Claflin, Mark) Modified on 2/22/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Raymond Corporation. (Claflin, Mark) Modified on 2/22/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Raymond Corporation Certificate of Filing and Service of Notice of Removal (Claflin, Mark) Modified on 2/22/2023 to correct party(Hushin, Z.). |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Raymond Corporation of Compliance with Court's Standing Order in Removed Cases (Claflin, Mark) Modified on 2/22/2023 to correct party(Hushin, Z.). |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Raymond Corporation of No Pending Motions (Claflin, Mark) Modified on 2/22/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark J. Claflin on behalf of Raymond Corporation (Claflin, Mark) Modified on 2/22/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Raymond Corporation from Hartford Superior Court, case number HHD-CV22-6160722-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7244702, filed by Raymond Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Claflin, Mark) Modified on 2/22/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.