Dries v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Danny Dries |
Smith & Nephew, Inc. |
3:2023cv00274 |
March 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Maria E Garcia |
Stefan R Underhill |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Smith & Nephew, Inc..(Anthony, Paula) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Smith & Nephew, Inc. waiver sent on 3/7/2023, answer due 5/6/2023 filed by Danny Dries. (Sabatini, James) |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Smith & Nephew, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Smith & Nephew P.L.C. for Smith & Nephew, Inc.. (Anthony, Paula) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Paula N. Anthony on behalf of Smith & Nephew, Inc. (Anthony, Paula) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Protective Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement,, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Danny Dries, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 3/3/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/2/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/2/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/1/2023 Discovery due by 9/1/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 10/6/2023 Signed by Clerk on 3/2/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/2/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Smith & Nephew, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7257448.), filed by Danny Dries. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sabatini, James) |
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dries v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Danny Dries | |
Represented By: | James V. Sabatini |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Paula N. Anthony |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.