Dingle v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Elly Dingle |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2023cv00337 |
| March 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Michael P Shea |
| Alvin W Thompson |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
OORDER: The Plaintiff's First Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Her Motion to Reverse or Remand the Decision of the Commissioner (ECF No. #13 ) is hereby GRANTED to June 9, 2023. The defendant's motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand is due by July 10, 2023. Any reply shall be filed by July 24, 2023. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 5/3/2023. (Mata, E.)
|
| Reset deadlines per Dkt. 14 Order: plaintiff's motion to reverse or remand is due by 6-9-2023 and defendant's motion to affirm or for voluntary remand is due by 7-10-2023. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 9, 2023 File Motion to Reverse or Remand the Decision of the Commissiober by Elly Dingle. (Grabow, Richard) |
|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER: The government filed the administrative record on April 10, 2023. The plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and supporting memorandum of law by May 10, 2023. The defendant shall file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand by June 9, 2023. Any reply pursuant to Local Rule 7(d) shall be filed by June 23, 2023. Parties, please confer regarding the merits of the case to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate, note the previously filed Standing Order which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda, and focus briefing on the application of the facts to the relevant and controlling legal authority rather than on boilerplate discussions of the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above, in the Standing Order, and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion. Any motion for extension of a deadline must comply with the Social Security Standing Order and Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three (3) days before the existing deadline. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 4/17/2023.(Mata, E.)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case is reassigned to Judge Alvin W. Thompson for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 4/12/2023.(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 10 Social Security Transcripts. (Attachments: #1 002 Court Transcript Index, #2 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 006 Non Disability Related Development, #6 007 Disability Related Development, #7 008 Medical Records Part 1, #8 009 Medical Records Part 2)(Jurrens, Erin) |
|
Filing 9
REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Jurrens on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Jurrens, Erin) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has fully completed the required information. He asserts that he is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that Plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint (ECF no. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 3/20/23. (Lefevre, Arthur)
|
| Filing 6 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/14/2023. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order Re: Social Security Cases Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/14/2023. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Elly Dingle. (Grabow, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Elly Dingle.(Grabow, Richard) |
| Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 5/13/2023. (Peterson, M) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
