Norwood v. United States Parole Commission
| Michael Norwood |
| United States Parole Commission |
| 3:2023cv00411 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. For the reasons described in the attached order, the Court ORDERS that the Respondent file a response on or before June 2, 2023, as to why the relief prayed for in the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. In addition, the Court ORDERS that the Clerk of Court serve a copy of this order and a copy of the petition and all attachments, to Respondent's representative, Assistant United States Attorney Michelle McConaghy, by e-mail to the Office of the United States Attorney, on or before April 28, 2023. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 04/21/2023.(Jean-Jacques, Walter)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/10/23. (Corriette, M.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/30/2023.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/30/2023.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/30/2023.(Barry, L) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Norwood. (Barry, L) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Michael Norwood. (Barry, L) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Michael Norwood. (Attachments: #1 Cover Page)(Barry, L) |
| Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Shafer, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Norwood v. United States Parole Commission | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Michael Norwood | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States Parole Commission | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
