Union Insurance Company v. Bushell et al
Union Insurance Company |
David Bushell, 17 Seaside Avenue LLC, RAK Construction LLC, RAK Remodeling LLC and Robert A. Kordas |
3:2023cv00461 |
April 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Robert A Richardson |
Stefan R Underhill |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen F. Adams on behalf of Union Insurance Company (Adams, Kathleen) |
Filing 12 ORDER: Attorney Adams moved for withdrawal on the basis that she had transitioned law firms and that her older firm was reflected in her appearance on the docket; however, it does not appear that Attorney Adams' intention was to be withdrawn from the case altogether. Rather, she appears to intend to enter a new appearance reflecting her position at her new law firm. The Court granted the motion to withdraw and terminated Attorney Adams. Attorney Adams is directed to update her account information to reflect the current firm information and file a new appearance in this case. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/11/2023. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Kathleen F. Adams terminated. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/11/2023. (Hurley, S.) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Kathleen F. Adams to Withdraw as Attorney by Union Insurance Company. (Adams, Kathleen) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen F. Adams on behalf of Union Insurance Company (Adams, Kathleen) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Union Insurance Company, #2 Disclosure Statement filed by Union Insurance Company, #3 Notice of Appearance filed by Union Insurance Company, 4 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Electronic Filing Order, #7 Standing Protective Order. Signed by Clerk on 4/12/2023. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 7 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/11/2023. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/11/2023. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/10/2023. Discovery due by 10/11/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 11/15/2023. Signed by Clerk on 4/11/2023. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/11/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron P. Cruz on behalf of Union Insurance Company (Cruz, Aaron) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Union Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Berkley Insurance Company for Union Insurance Company. (Adams, Kathleen) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7307883.), filed by Union Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Adams, Kathleen) |
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.