St. Onge v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Michael St. Onge |
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. doing business as DeWalt |
3:2023cv00516 |
April 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Thomas O Farrish |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 NOTICE of Related Case by Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (Cerreta, John) |
Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick John Klorczyk, III on behalf of Michael St. Onge (Klorczyk, Frederick) |
Filing 24 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #19 MOTION for Attorney(s) Frederick J. Klorcyzk III to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7359303) by Michael St. Onge. (Reardon, James) |
Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #17 MOTION for Attorney(s) Michael B. Shortnacy to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number BCTDC-7357987) by Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. (Shortnacy, Michael) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael B Shortnacy on behalf of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (Shortnacy, Michael) |
Filing 21 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Victor A. Bolden: Telephonic Status Conference held on 5/30/2023. Total Time: 5 minutes (Court Reporter Sharon Montini.) (Sullivan, John) |
Filing 20 ORDER granting #19 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Frederick J. Klorcyzk III, Esq. Certificate of Good Standing due by 7/24/2023. Signed by Clerk on 5/25/2023. (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Attorney(s) Frederick J. Klorcyzk III to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7359303) by Michael St. Onge. (Reardon, James) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Certificate of Good Standing due by 7/23/2023. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/24/2023. (Sullivan, John) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Attorney(s) Michael B. Shortnacy to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number BCTDC-7357987) by Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cerreta, John) |
Filing 16 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE.RESET FROM 5/29/2023.Telephonic Status Conference set for 5/30/2023 at 2:00 PM before Judge Victor A. Bolden.Dial-in: 888-808-6929Participant Code: 9284309If you are prompted to enter a security code, please bypass it.(Sullivan, John) |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. Telephonic Status Conference set for 5/29/2023 at 10:00 AM before Judge Victor A. Bolden. Dial-in: 888-808-6929Participant Code: 9284309If you are prompted to enter a security code, please bypass it.(Sullivan, John) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's motion for an extension of time until July 17, 2023, to respond to the Complaint is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/19/2023. (Sullivan, John) |
Filing 13 ORDER re: recusal of Judge Thomas O. Farrish. Judge Farrish recuses himself from this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455. The defendant is represented by Attorney John W. Cerreta of Day Pitney LLP. Judge Farrish was, until December 31, 2019, Attorney Cerreta's law partner. Although more than three years have elapsed since Judge Farrish left Day Pitney, making his recusal no longer mandatory in all cases in which the firm appears, see Swoverland v. GlaxoSmithKline, No. 3:10-cv-914 (SRU), 2010 WL 7862769, at *1 (D. Conn. Aug. 23, 2010), his relationship with Attorney Cerreta is such that his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Judge Farrish therefore recuses himself, and the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to associate a different, randomly-selected magistrate judge with the case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 5/19/23.(Wood, R.) |
Answer deadline updated for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. to 7/17/2023. (Sullivan, John) |
Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until July 17, 2023 to Respond to #1 Complaint by Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. (Cerreta, John) |
Filing 11 Disclosure Statement by Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent T Rowe Price for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. (Cerreta, John) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John W Cerreta on behalf of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (Cerreta, John) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michael St. Onge. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. served on 4/27/2023, answer due 5/18/2023. (Reardon, James) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *James J. Reardon, Jr* *Reardon Scanlon LLP* *45 South Main Street Suite 305* *West Hartford, CT 06107*. (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 7 Disclosure Statement by Michael St. Onge. (Reardon, James) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Michael St. Onge, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 4/25/2023.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 4/25/2023.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 4/25/2023.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/24/2023; Discovery due by 10/25/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 11/29/2023. Signed by Clerk on 4/25/2023.(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/25/26.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action against Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7323948.), filed by Michael St. Onge.(Reardon, James) Modified on 4/25/2023 to correct party(Hushin, Z.). |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. (Reardon, James) |
Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: St. Onge v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Michael St. Onge | |
Represented By: | James J. Reardon, Jr |
Represented By: | Frederick John Klorczyk, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. doing business as DeWalt | |
Represented By: | Michael B Shortnacy |
Represented By: | John W Cerreta |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.