LifeVoxel.AI Inc. v. Mamillapalli
| LifeVoxel.AI Inc. |
| Kishore Mamillapailli and Kishore Mamillapalli |
| 3:2023cv00534 |
| April 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
RESPONSE re #17 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by LifeVoxel.AI Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Sargent, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 17
Opposition To Petition re #16 MOTION to Compel Arbotration filed by Kishore Mamillapalli. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 3A, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 9A, #12 Exhibit 9B, #13 Exhibit 10, #14 Exhibit 11, #15 Exhibit 12, #16 Exhibit 13, #17 Envelopes) (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Compel Arbotration by LifeVoxel.AI Inc..Responses due by 8/17/2023 (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Joseph P. Sargent)(Sargent, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER. Plaintiff shall file its motion to compel arbitration and/or for appointment of an arbitrator by July 31, 2023. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/10/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 14
Notice of Pro Se Appearance, by Kishore Mamillapalli. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 13
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Kishore Mamillapalli. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER. Although Defendant has filed an "opposition to petition to compel arbitration," ECF No. 11, there are two problems with this filing. First, as a preliminary matter, Defendant has not filed a notice of pro se appearance form, which he must do by July 10, 2023. Second, Defendant's filing at ECF No. 11 contains his allegations and arguments regarding the arbitration sought by Plaintiff, but it does not constitute an answer to Plaintiff's complaint. By July 14, 2023, Defendant must file an answer to Plaintiff's complaint, in which Defendant shall list the numbered paragraphs in Plaintiff's complaint and state his response to each paragraph. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b). For example, for each paragraph in the complaint, Defendant can admit the allegations in full or in part, deny the allegations in full or in part, or state that Defendant lacks sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations. Thereafter, if Plaintiff files a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. sec. 4 and/or for appointment of an arbitrator pursuant to the FAA, sec. 5, the parties can file memoranda in support or opposition to the motion pursuant to D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/23/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER denying #2 Plaintiff's motion for an order to show cause. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A), Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's petition to compel arbitration, ECF No. 1, after being duly served pursuant to Rule 4. Thereafter, if necessary, Plaintiff may file a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), 9 U.S.C. sec. 4 and/or for appointment of an arbitrator pursuant to the FAA, sec. 5. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/13/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Kishore Mamillapalli* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Joseph Patrick Sargent* *1595 Black Rock Turnpike* *Fairfield, CT 06824*. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Disclosure Statement filed by LifeVoxel.AI Inc., 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #7 Protective Order, #6 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by LifeVoxel.AI Inc., #2 MOTION for Show Cause Order filed by LifeVoxel.AI Inc. Signed by Clerk on 4/27/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 4/27/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 4/27/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/26/2023. Discovery due by 10/27/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 12/1/2023. Signed by Clerk on 4/27/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement by LifeVoxel.AI Inc. identifying Corporate Parent AI Visualize Inc. for LifeVoxel.AI Inc.. (Sargent, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 3
Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/27/23.(Hushin, Z.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Show Cause Order by LifeVoxel.AI Inc.. (Sargent, Joseph)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Kishore Mamillapailli. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7327188.), filed by LifeVoxel.AI Inc..(Sargent, Joseph) Modified on 4/27/2023 to correct filed against party (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Kishore Mamillapailli. (Sargent, Joseph) Modified on 4/27/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
