Tenezaca v. Monroe Nails, Inc. et al
| Rosa Maria Lucero Tenezaca |
| Monroe Nails, Inc. doing business as Monroe Nail Salon and Grace Cho |
| 3:2023cv00573 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet C Hall |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time until July 10, 2023 to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/8/2023. (Sichanh, Christina)
|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rosa Maria Lucero Tenezaca. Grace Cho served on 5/19/2023, answer due 6/9/2023. (Hang, Jian) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Rosa Maria Lucero Tenezaca. Monroe Nails, Inc. served on 5/19/2023, answer due 6/9/2023. (Hang, Jian) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time until 7/10/2023 to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint #1 Complaint by Grace Cho, Monroe Nails, Inc.. (Mitchell, Robert) |
| Judge S. Dave Vatti added. Judge Maria E. Garcia no longer assigned to case. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement by Monroe Nails, Inc.. (Mitchell, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Burdette Mitchell on behalf of Grace Cho, Monroe Nails, Inc. (Mitchell, Robert) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Grace Cho, Monroe Nails, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jian Hang* *Hang & Associates, PLLC* *136-18 39th Avenue., Suite 1003* *Flushing, NY 11354*. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #7 Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Order, #1 Complaint filed by Rosa Maria Lucero Tenezaca, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #5 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 5/5/2023.(Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING ORDER FOR FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT CASES. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/3/2023.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER Re Discovery. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/3/2023.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/3/2023.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/3/2023.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/2/2023; Discovery due by 11/2/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 12/7/2023. Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2023.(Freberg, B)
|
| Judge Janet C. Hall and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7334868.), filed by Rosa Maria Lucero Tenezaca. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Hang, Jian) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Hang, Jian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
