Smith v. McKay et al
| Lawrence Smith |
| Robert J. McKay, Jessica Gouveia, John Newsome and Gordon Oliver |
| 3:2023cv00588 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Docket Entry Correction re #9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Replacement PDF. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Lawrence Smith. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Lawrence Smith. (Mendez, D) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2023: #1 Replacement PDF) (Mendez, D). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The petitioner has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, he seeks to file a Petition for Writ of Mandamus without pre-paying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits him to do so if, among other things, he submits a financial affidavit showing that he is unable to pay. To assist inmates in demonstrating inability to pay, the District of Connecticut has prepared a standard-form in forma pauperis application.In this case, the petitioner submitted the wrong in forma pauperis application form. Among other things, the form he filled out does not have a space for providing the balance of his inmate trust account. His application is therefore insufficient. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send the petitioner a blank copy of the correct application form at his address of record. The petitioner is directed to fill out the form completely and accurately, including truthfully answering Question 7 on page 2 under penalty of perjury, and to file it with the Clerk of the Court. If he does not do so by June 12, 2023, his petition may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 5/23/2023.(Corriette, M.) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Lawrence Smith. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/3/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/3/2023.(Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/3/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2023.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: We received your Petition for Writ of Mandamus which has been assigned case number 23cv588. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 6/2/2023 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 6/2/2023 Signed by Clerk on 5/3/2023.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Lawrence Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Attachment, #3 Envelope)(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
