Velasco v. Phillips et al
| Victor J. Velasco |
| Kara Phillips, Mallory Muzykoski, Ingrid Feder, Paul Fiore, Kudzal, Joseph Nemeth, Michael Peterson, Dousis, Flores, Colby, Robert Martin, Carlos Nunez, Mangual and Verito |
| 3:2023cv00591 |
| May 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Alvin W Thompson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 5/23/2023. (Corriette, M.)
|
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, by Victor J. Velasco. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Victor J. Velasco. (Mendez, D) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/22/2023: #1 Replacement PDF) (Mendez, D). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, he seeks to commence a federal lawsuit without pre-paying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits him to do so if, among other things, he submits a financial affidavit showing that he is unable to pay, accompanied by a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six month period preceding his complaint. To assist inmates in demonstrating inability to pay, the District of Connecticut has prepared a standard-form in forma pauperis application.In this case, the plaintiff submitted the wrong in forma pauperis application form. His application is therefore insufficient. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send the plaintiff a blank copy of the correct application form at his address of record. The plaintiff is directed to fill out the form completely and accurately, including the authorization and certification pages, and to file it with the Clerk of the Court. If he does not do so by May 29,2023, his case may be dismissed.(Corriette, M.) |
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 5/5/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/5/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 5/5/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/5/2023.(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Victor J. Velasco. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Victor J. Velasco. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Colby, Dousis, Ingrid Feder, Paul Fiore, Flores, Kudzal, Mangual, Robert Martin, Mallory Muzykoski, Joseph Nemeth, Carlos Nunez, Michael Peterson, Kara Phillips, Verito, filed by Victor J. Velasco.(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Judge Alvin W. Thompson and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
