Greer v. EM et al
| Daniel Greer |
| EM and Regalcare at Prospect, LLC |
| 3:2023cv00596 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 Memorandum in Support re #15 MOTION to Dismiss filed by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Moriarty, James) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC.Responses due by 7/21/2023 (Moriarty, James) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time until June 30, 2023 to Answer or Respond to the Complaint. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/15/2023. (Khabbaz, D.)
|
| Answer deadline updated for All Defendants. (Khabbaz, D.) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by John Louis Cesaroni on behalf of EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC (Cesaroni, John) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 30, 2023 to Answer or Respond to the Complaint on Consent by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC. (Beatman, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC Signed Statement Pursuant to Standing Order on Removed Cases (Moriarty, James) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC (Moriarty, James) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Notice (Other) filed by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC, #6 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 5 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #8 Protective Order, #3 Disclosure Statement filed by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC, #1 Notice of Removal filed by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC, #7 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 5/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order)(Oliver, T.) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/8/2023. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/8/2023. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 6
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/7/2023 Discovery due by 11/7/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 12/12/2023 Signed by Clerk on 5/8/2023. (Oliver, T.)
|
| Filing 5 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/8/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC Notice of Pending Motions (Beatman, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement Rule 7.1 by EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC. (Beatman, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James M. Moriarty on behalf of EM, Regalcare at Prospect, LLC (Moriarty, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Regalcare at Prospect, LLC, EM Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7339505, filed by Regalcare at Prospect, LLC, EM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Beatman, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
