Salaman v. City of New Haven Conn. et al
Luis Salaman |
City of New Haven Conn., John Doe, Frank Sanchez, Frank Grillo, Joseph Altimari, Tae H. Kim, James Domachowski and Zachary Burke |
3:2023cv00639 |
May 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Robert M Spector |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 6/8/2023. (Corriette, M.) |
Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Luis Salaman. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luis Salaman. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Luis Salaman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, he seeks to commence a federal lawsuit without pre-paying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits him to do so if, among other things, he submits a financial affidavit showing that he is unable to pay, accompanied by a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six month period preceding his complaint. To assist inmates in demonstrating inability to pay, the District of Connecticut has prepared a standard-form in forma pauperis application.In this case, the plaintiff did not submit a signed certification of inmate account balance, which is on page five of the form, or a copy of his inmate trust account statement. His application is therefore insufficient. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send the plaintiff a blank copy of the correct application form at his address of record. The plaintiff is directed to fill out page five of the form completely and accurately, and to file it with the Clerk of the Court along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement covering at least the period from November 15, 2022, to May 15, 2023. If he does not do so by June 8, 2023, his case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 5/19/2023.(Corriette, M.) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 5/15/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 5/15/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Luis Salaman. (Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/15/2023.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luis Salaman. (Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joseph Altimari, Zachary Burke, City of New Haven Conn., John Doe(Chief of Police), John Doe ((SA)(SWAT)), James Domachowski, Frank Grillo, Tae H. Kim, Frank Sanchez, filed by Luis Salaman. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.